Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Exposure assessment and gender differences

G N Greenberg1, J M Dement

  • 1Division of Occupational Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710.

Journal of Occupational Medicine. : Official Publication of the Industrial Medical Association
|August 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Chrysotile asbestos exposure: cancer and lung disease risks.

New solutions : a journal of environmental and occupational health policy : NS·2012
Same author

Evaluation of direct workers' compensation costs for musculoskeletal injuries surrounding interventions to reduce patient lifting.

Occupational and environmental medicine·2011
Same author

Physical assault among nursing staff employed in acute care.

Work (Reading, Mass.)·2010
Same author

Occupational injuries among aides and nurses in acute care.

American journal of industrial medicine·2009
Same author

Systematic reviews of workplace injury interventions: what are we missing?

La Medicina del lavoro·2009
Same author

Lung cancer mortality and fibre exposures among North Carolina asbestos textile workers.

Occupational and environmental medicine·2009
Same journal

The private funding of public research. New directions in the administration of occupational and environmental health research.

Journal of occupational medicine. : official publication of the Industrial Medical Association·1994
Same journal

High-cost analysis. A closer look at the case for work-site health promotion.

Journal of occupational medicine. : official publication of the Industrial Medical Association·1994
Same journal

Teaching stress management skills to occupational and environmental health physicians and practitioners. A graduate-level practicum.

Journal of occupational medicine. : official publication of the Industrial Medical Association·1994
Same journal

Exposure to biogenic silica fibers and respiratory health in Hawaii sugarcane workers.

Journal of occupational medicine. : official publication of the Industrial Medical Association·1994
Same journal

The detection of increased amounts of the extracellular domain of the epidermal growth factor receptor in serum during carcinogenesis in asbestosis patients.

Journal of occupational medicine. : official publication of the Industrial Medical Association·1994
Same journal

Hazardous waste worker education. Long-term effects.

Journal of occupational medicine. : official publication of the Industrial Medical Association·1994
See all related articles

Occupational exposure assessments may be unreliable for women due to employment differences and unexamined career exposures. Addressing these issues is crucial for accurate occupational cancer epidemiology and effective prevention strategies.

Area of Science:

  • Occupational Epidemiology
  • Environmental Health
  • Toxicology

Background:

  • Exposure assessments in occupational epidemiology aim to establish risk gradients or estimate exposure-response dosimetry.
  • Quantitative exposure data are often unavailable, necessitating the use of surrogate or qualitative measures.
  • Traditional study designs may exclude women or fail to account for unique occupational and domestic exposures.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight limitations in current occupational exposure assessment methods for women.
  • To identify factors that introduce systematic errors and confound risk evaluation in epidemiological studies.
  • To emphasize the need for improved methodologies in occupational cancer research involving women.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing methodologies in occupational exposure assessment.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of potential biases introduced by women's employment patterns and domestic exposures.
  • Consideration of sex-based differences in xenobiotic metabolism and clinical disease recognition.

    • Main Results:

    • Surrogate measures for exposure may be less reliable for women due to differing employment patterns.
    • Traditionally female-dominated careers have not been fully evaluated for occupational exposures.
    • Domestic exposures and male/female differences in toxicokinetics can confound risk assessment.

    Conclusions:

    • Current occupational epidemiological study designs may systematically underestimate risks for women.
    • Valid preventive strategies for occupational cancer require recognition of sex-specific exposure and biological factors.
    • Further research is needed to develop accurate exposure assessment tools for diverse workforces.