Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Interpretational factors in conditional reasoning

V A Thompson1

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada.

Memory & Cognition
|November 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Meta-analysis to predict sweating and respiration rates for Bos indicus, Bos taurus, and their crossbreds.

Journal of animal science·2011
Same author

Belief-based and covariation-based cues affect causal discounting.

Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale·2001
Same author

Frequency versus probability formats in statistical word problems.

Cognition·2000
Same author

The task-specific nature of domain-general reasoning.

Cognition·2000
Same author

Strategy selection in causal reasoning: when beliefs and covariation collide.

Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale·2000
Same author

Akathisia and anesthesia: refusal of surgery after the administration of metoclopramide.

Anesthesia and analgesia·1998

Perceived necessity and sufficiency are key to understanding conditional reasoning, influencing how people interpret statements like permissions and causes. Abstract reasoning also plays a role, independent of these perceived relationships.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Logic and Reasoning

Background:

  • Conditional reasoning involves understanding 'if-then' statements.
  • The concepts of necessity (must be true) and sufficiency (guarantees truth) are crucial in evaluating these statements.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how perceived necessity and sufficiency influence conditional reasoning.
  • To examine these relationships across different types of pragmatic relations and argument structures.

Main Methods:

  • Two experiments were conducted.
  • Participants evaluated conditional arguments and completed truth table tasks involving pragmatic relations (permission, obligation, causation, definition).
  • The temporal order of events (forward vs. reversed) was manipulated.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Perceived necessity and sufficiency significantly predicted reasoning performance across various conditions.
  • The influence of necessity/sufficiency was stronger for forward statements than for reversed ones.
  • Participants favored valid arguments over invalid ones, irrespective of necessity/sufficiency, suggesting abstract reasoning plays a role.

Conclusions:

  • Perceived necessity and sufficiency are generally useful for interpreting conditional relationships.
  • The utility of necessity/sufficiency-based interpretations varies depending on the type of conditional relation.
  • Abstract, content-free representations contribute to conditional reasoning alongside pragmatic factors.