Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Perspectives on craniofacial growth

J C Ohman1, J T Richtsmeier

  • 1Johns Hopkins Cleft & Craniofacial Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.

Clinics in Plastic Surgery
|October 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Morphological integration of the skull in craniofacial anomalies.

Orthodontics & craniofacial research·2009
Same author

A chromosome 21 critical region does not cause specific Down syndrome phenotypes.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2004
Same author

The effect of neurocranial surgery on basicranial morphology in isolated sagittal craniosynostosis.

The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association·2001
Same author

Too much of a good thing: mechanisms of gene action in Down syndrome.

Trends in genetics : TIG·2001
Same author

Parallels of craniofacial maldevelopment in Down syndrome and Ts65Dn mice.

Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists·2000
Same author

Discovery and genetic localization of Down syndrome cerebellar phenotypes using the Ts65Dn mouse.

Human molecular genetics·1999

Understanding craniofacial growth is key to predicting surgical outcomes. This research uses 3D imaging and a large database to forecast patient appearance, aiding reconstructive surgery decisions.

Area of Science:

  • Craniofacial biology
  • Developmental biology
  • Medical imaging

Background:

  • Postnatal craniofacial growth significantly impacts normal and abnormal morphology.
  • Limited understanding of 3D skull changes during postnatal development.
  • Collaboration between surgeons and radiologists generates valuable data on craniofacial growth.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the role of the growth process in mediating reconstructive surgery outcomes for craniofacial conditions.
  • To develop a predictive model for the future appearance of craniofacial patients based on empirical growth patterns.
  • To propose a classification of craniofacial dysmorphology based on surgical response and underlying etiology.

Main Methods:

  • Collection and organization of a large database of craniofacial images.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Utilizing 3D imaging to analyze craniofacial changes during postnatal growth.
  • Developing computational tools to simulate and predict craniofacial growth patterns.

    • Main Results:

    • Surgical outcomes may be predicted by the etiology of the craniofacial condition, not solely the dysmorphology.
    • Positive surgical response suggests the growth process is not integral to the dysmorphology.
    • Poor surgical response indicates an underlying growth disorder.

    Conclusions:

    • A classification system for craniofacial dysmorphology can be based on patient response to surgery, reflecting etiological differences.
    • Predictive growth modeling can significantly alter preoperative consultations for craniofacial patients.
    • Statistical comparison of simulated growth to normative data can determine if a patient's condition diverges further from normal over time.