Related Experiment Videos
Sampling for vaginal candidosis: how good is it?
J Emmerson1, A Gunputrao, J Hawkswell
1Department of Genitourinary Medicine, Retford Hospital, UK.
International Journal of STD & AIDS
|September 1, 1994
Summary
Screening for vaginal candidosis in genitourinary medicine patients found a 26.3% positive rate. Microscopy aids early diagnosis, detecting most symptomatic cases and identifying optimal sample sites for accurate results.
Area of Science:
- Medical Microbiology
- Clinical Diagnostics
- Genitourinary Medicine
Background:
- Vaginal candidosis is a common condition requiring effective diagnostic methods.
- Genitourinary medicine departments manage diverse patient populations with potential infections.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the prevalence of vaginal candidosis in patients attending a genitourinary medicine department.
- To evaluate the utility of microscopy in diagnosing vaginal candidosis.
- To identify the most sensitive sample site for microbiological diagnosis.
Main Methods:
- Screening of patients attending a genitourinary medicine clinic for vaginal candidosis.
- Microscopic examination of Gram-stained vaginal smears for diagnosis.
- Vaginal cultures performed on samples from different anatomical sites (anterior fornix, left lateral vaginal wall).
Main Results:
- A 26.3% positive rate for vaginal candidosis was observed in the studied population.
- Microscopy detected 64.8% of symptomatic cases, proving useful for early diagnosis.
- The anterior fornix was the most sensitive site for culture diagnosis (positive predictive value 0.88), while the left lateral vaginal wall was least sensitive (0.81).
Conclusions:
- Vaginal candidosis screening in genitourinary medicine settings reveals significant prevalence.
- Gram-stained microscopy is a valuable tool for the rapid diagnosis of symptomatic vaginal candidosis.
- Anatomical site selection is crucial for optimizing the sensitivity of culture-based diagnosis of vaginal candidosis.