Related Experiment Videos
Midwife managed delivery unit: a randomised controlled comparison with consultant led care
V A Hundley1, F M Cruickshank, G D Lang
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen Maternity Hospital.
Summary
Midwife-led intrapartum care for low-risk women promotes mobility and reduces interventions without increasing neonatal risk. However, high transfer rates indicate current criteria cannot predict all low-risk cases throughout labor.
Area of Science:
- Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Maternal Health
- Evidence-Based Midwifery
Background:
- Low-risk women are often managed in consultant-led labor wards, potentially leading to increased interventions.
- Midwife-managed units offer an alternative approach to intrapartum care for select populations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare intrapartum care and delivery outcomes for low-risk women in midwife-managed units versus consultant-led labor wards.
- To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of midwife-led care models.
Main Methods:
- A pragmatic randomized controlled trial involving 2844 low-risk women.
- Women were randomized 2:1 to either a midwife-managed unit or a consultant-led labor ward.
- Primary outcomes included maternal and perinatal morbidity.
Main Results:
- Midwife-managed care resulted in significantly more mobility and less intervention (e.g., analgesia, episiotomy).
- No significant differences were observed in mode of delivery or fetal outcomes between the two settings.
- A substantial proportion of women (34% antepartum, 16% intrapartum) required transfer from the midwife unit to the labor ward.
Conclusions:
- Midwife-managed intrapartum care for low-risk women is associated with increased mobility and reduced interventions, with no adverse impact on neonatal outcomes.
- The high transfer rate highlights limitations in antenatal risk assessment for predicting intrapartum risk.
- Further refinement of risk assessment tools is needed to optimize midwife-led care models.