Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 15, 2026

Programmed Electrical Stimulation in Mice
Published on: May 26, 2010
Importance of maintained atrio-ventricular synchrony in patients with pacemakers
J Frielingsdorf1, A E Gerber, O M Hess
1Cardiology Division, University Hospital, Zürich, Switzerland.
Insights
Dual chamber pacemakers, maintaining atrial-ventricular (AV) synchrony, may offer better outcomes than ventricular pacing alone. However, optimal AV delay is key for cardiac function, especially at rest.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Biomedical Engineering
Background:
- Atrial contraction significantly impacts cardiac function, particularly in patients with pacemakers.
- The comparison between dual-chamber pacemakers (maintaining AV synchrony) and rate-responsive ventricular pacemakers is crucial for understanding optimal pacing strategies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the haemodynamic, clinical, and prognostic advantages of AV synchrony in dual-chamber pacemakers compared to rate-responsive ventricular pacemakers.
- To assess the impact of AV synchrony on cardiac performance during rest and exercise, and in daily activities.
Main Methods:
- Review of existing literature on dual-chamber and rate-responsive ventricular pacemakers.
- Analysis of haemodynamic, clinical, and prognostic data related to AV synchrony and pacing modes.
Main Results:
- Optimal AV delay in dual-chamber pacing enhances cardiac performance at rest.
- During exercise, heart rate increase is a more significant factor than AV synchrony for cardiac performance and capacity.
- Patients with pacemakers maintaining AV synchrony show reduced morbidity and mortality compared to those with ventricular pacing alone.
Conclusions:
- While dual-chamber pacemakers with AV synchrony may offer prognostic benefits, their advantages during daily activities require further investigation.
- Pacemaker complications are comparable between single and dual-chamber devices, with distinct issues like pacemaker syndrome and atrial sensing problems.
- Dual-chamber pacemakers present challenges including higher costs and intensive follow-up requirements.
Abstract:
The effect of atrial contraction on cardiac function is reviewed in patients with dual chamber and rate-responsive ventricular pacemakers. The question posed was is there any haemodynamic, clinical or prognostic advantage of AV synchrony in dual chamber pacemakers in comparison to rate-responsive ventricular pacemakers? Optimal AV delay in dual chamber pacing favours cardiac performance at rest, while during exercise the increase in heart rate rather than AV synchrony influences cardiac performance and working capacity. However, there is little information on the benefit of maintained AV synchrony in patients' daily activities. Patients with pacemakers which maintain AV synchrony seem to have less morbidity and mortality than patients with ventricular stimulation alone, and there are comparable rates of complication in carriers of single and dual chamber pacemakers, the former showing problems with the pacemaker syndrome and the latter with atrial sensing and pacemaker-induced tachycardias. The disadvantage of dual chamber pacemakers are higher costs and time-consuming controls.
Related Concept Videos
Pulse rhythm
Conversely, an irregular pulse pattern is termed dysrhythmia, stemming from disruptions in cardiac muscle...
Electrophysiology of Normal Cardiac Rhythm
Mechanism of Cardiac Arrhythmias
Conduction System of the Heart
The pacemaker cells are located in two primary nodes: the sinoatrial (SA) node and the atrioventricular (AV) node. The SA node pacemaker cells can autonomously depolarize, triggering an action potential that leads to the...
Disturbances in Heart Rhythm
Arrhythmias are categorized by their speed, rhythm, and origin. A slow heart...
Conduction System of the Heart
This system relies on the unique properties of nodal and Purkinje cells:...

