Related Experiment Videos
Inherent intractability of the ascertainment problem for pedigree data: a general likelihood framework
1Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, NY.
American Journal of Human Genetics
|January 1, 1995
Summary
Ascertainment correction in genetic analysis is complex, especially with sequential sampling. New proband-independent (PI) and proband-dependent (PD) sampling distinctions reveal that standard methods are often intractable for complex pedigrees.
Area of Science:
- Genetics
- Statistical Genetics
- Bioinformatics
Background:
- Ascertainment bias occurs when families are selected based on affected individuals.
- Correcting for ascertainment is crucial but lacks methods for many sampling schemes, like sequential pedigree sampling.
- Investigating the necessity of ascertainment correction for large pedigrees and multiple probands is ongoing.
Purpose of the Study:
- To address challenges in ascertainment correction for segregation analysis.
- To introduce and analyze proband-independent (PI) and proband-dependent (PD) sampling.
- To evaluate the impact of pedigree structure and size on ascertainment correction.
Main Methods:
- Distinguishing between PI and PD sampling based on pedigree structure dependency.
- Analyzing the validity of conditioning on observed pedigree structure under different sampling schemes.
- Examining the feasibility of PI sampling for large pedigrees.
Main Results:
- Conditioning on pedigree structure is generally incorrect for PD sampling, except for single selection.
- PI sampling of large pedigrees is often not feasible.
- Current methods for genetic modeling in ascertained data are frequently intractable.
Conclusions:
- The problem of ascertainment correction in genetic analysis is often intractable with current methods.
- Standard approaches fail for complex pedigrees and sequential sampling strategies.
- Development of robust approximate methods for ascertainment correction is recommended.