Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Guidelines for treating hypertension: improved care or retarded progress?

J D Swales1

  • 1Department of Medicine, Leicester University, England.

American Journal of Hypertension
|October 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Journal: tradition and change.

Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine·2010
Same author

Issues of the day: what are they?

Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine·2010
Same author

The new Journal-progress report.

Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine·2010
Same author

It couldn't happen here.

Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine·2010
Same author

Reading for pleasure: greene and baron corvo.

British medical journal·2010
Same author

Effect of aging on the prognostic significance of ambulatory systolic, diastolic, and pulse pressure in essential hypertension.

Circulation·2001

International hypertension guidelines show agreement on some treatments but differ significantly on drug thresholds and targets. These guidelines, often lacking definitive evidence, require clear definitions of their limitations for nonexpert users.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Public Health Policy

Background:

  • Numerous national and international organizations have issued guidelines for hypertension management.
  • Despite general agreement on some treatment aspects, significant discrepancies exist regarding critical parameters.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the variations and consensus in hypertension management guidelines.
  • To highlight the implications of differing guidelines for nonexpert audiences.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of published hypertension management guidelines.
  • Review of evidence supporting guideline recommendations.

Main Results:

  • Significant differences identified in blood pressure thresholds for treatment initiation and target pressures.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Variability noted in recommended initial monotherapy drug selection.
  • Apparent consensus exists despite a lack of definitive supporting evidence and overlapping guideline committee memberships.

    • Conclusions:

    • Hypertension guidelines exhibit notable heterogeneity, particularly in drug treatment thresholds and targets.
    • The composition of guidelines for nonexperts is valuable but necessitates explicit acknowledgment of limitations and potential risks.