Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 3, 2026

Deep Neuromuscular Blockade Leads to a Larger Intraabdominal Volume During Laparoscopy
Published on: June 25, 2013
Reversal of doxacurium and pancuronium neuromuscular blockade with neostigmine in children
J C Bevan1, J P Purday, E J Reimer
1Department of Anaesthesia, British Columbia's Children's Hospital, Vancouver, Canada.
Abstract:
Recovery after doxacurium and pancuronium neuromuscular blockade and their acceleration by neostigmine have not been compared in children. Therefore, 60 paediatric surgical patients aged 2-10 yr (ASA 1-2) were studied. They were randomized to receive doxacurium 30 micrograms.kg-1 or pancuronium 70 micrograms.kg-1 iv during propofol, fentanyl, isoflurane and nitrous oxide anaesthesia. Electromyographic (EMG) responses of the adductor pollicis to train-of-four (TOF) stimulation of the ulnar nerve were recorded every ten seconds using a Datex NMT monitor. Six patients in each relaxant group received neostigmine (0, 5, 10, 20 or 40 micrograms.kg-1) with atropine by random allocation when first twitch height (T1) had recovered to 25% of control. Spontaneous recovery after ten minutes was similar following doxacurium (mean +/- SEM values of 45.0 +/- 3.9 vs 49.5 +/- 10.0% for T1 and 25.2 +/- 3.8 vs 14.8 +/- 3.6% for TOF ratios). Dose-responses to neostigmine were calculated from the log dose vs logit of T1 or TOF ratio after ten minutes. Neostigmine-assisted recovery was not different in the two groups, with ED70 and ED90 doses for T1 of 14.3 +/- 1.8 and 25.7 +/- 2.7 micrograms.kg-1 for doxacurium and 12.5 +/- 1.7 and 25.3 +/- 2.3 micrograms.kg-1 for pancuronium. Time to recovery of TOF ratio to 70% after neostigmine 40 micrograms.kg-1 was 2.3 +/- 1.0 and 4.2 +/- 1.7 min (P = NS) following pancuronium and doxacurium, respectively. Adjusted recovery due to neostigmine alone (spontaneous recovery subtracted from the total) required two to three times higher doses of neostigmine.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
More Related Videos
07:20Repeated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Combined with Action Observation Training in Children with Spastic Cerebral Palsy
Published on: August 9, 2024
04:30Stimulated Single Fiber Electromyography (SFEMG) for Assessing Neuromuscular Junction Transmission in Rodent Models
Published on: March 8, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Nondepolarizing (Competitive) Neuromuscular Blockers: Mechanism of Action
Competitive antagonists prevent acetylcholine from binding to its receptor, inhibiting membrane depolarization. Without conformational changes or intrinsic...
Nondepolarizing (Competitive) Neuromuscular Blockers: Pharmacological Actions
Although all competitive neuromuscular blockers are designed...
Nondepolarizing (Competitive) Neuromuscular Blockers: Pharmacokinetics
Instead, they are transported by the blood to different tissues. Muscles with a greater blood supply (arteries) and blood flow receive more...
Depolarizing Blockers: Mechanism of Action
Succinylcholine is the most commonly used depolarizing blocker. Chemically, it constitutes two molecules of acetylcholine joined together by an acetate methyl group. They act on the receptors in the same way as acetylcholine. Because succinylcholine...
Depolarizing Blockers: Pharmocokinetics
Skeletal Muscle Relaxants: Therapeutic Uses