Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 4, 2026

The WATCHMAN Left Atrial Appendage Closure Device for Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: February 28, 2012
Antibiotic prophylaxis in permanent pacemaker implantation: a prospective randomised trial
J P Mounsey1, M J Griffith, M Tynan
1Department of Cardiology, Northern Regional Cardiothoracic Centre Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne.
Background:
Pacemaker pocket infection is a potentially serious problem after permanent pacemaker implantation. Antibiotic prophylaxis is commonly prescribed to reduce the incidence of this complication, but current trial evidence of its efficacy is conflicting. A large prospective randomised trial was therefore performed of antibiotic prophylaxis in permanent pacemaker implantation. The intention was firstly to determine whether antibiotic prophylaxis is efficacious in these patients and secondly to identify which patients are at the highest risk of infection.
Methods:
A prospective randomised open trial of flucloxacillin (clindamycin if the patient was allergic to penicillin) v no antibiotic was performed in a cohort of patients undergoing first implantation of a permanent pacing system over a 17 month period. Intravenous antibiotics were started at the time of implantation and continued for 48 hours. The trial endpoint was a repeat operation for an infective complication.
Results:
473 patients were entered into a randomised trial. 224 received antibiotic prophylaxis and 249 received no antibiotics. A further 183 patients were not randomised but were treated according to the operator's preference (64 antibiotics, 119 no antibiotics); these patients are included only in the analysis of predictors of infection. Patients were followed up for a mean (SD) of 19(5) months. Among the patients in the randomised group there were nine infections requiring a repeat operation, all in the group not receiving antibiotic (P = 0.003). In the total patient cohort there were 13 infections, all but one in the non-antibiotic group (P = 0.006). Nine of the infections presented as erosion of the pulse generator or electrode, three as septicaemia secondary to Staphylococcus aureus, and one as a pocket abscess secondary to Staphylococcus epidermidis. Infections were significantly more common when the operator was inexperienced (< or = 100 previous patients), the operation was prolonged, or after a repeat operation for non-infective complications (principally lead displacement). Infection was not significantly more common in patients identified preoperatively as being at high risk (for example patients with diabetes mellitus, patients receiving long term steroid treatment), although there was a trend in this direction.
Conclusions:
Antibiotic prophylaxis significantly reduced the incidence of infective complications requiring a repeat operation after permanent pacemaker implantation. It is suggested that antibiotics should be used routinely.
Insights
Antibiotic prophylaxis significantly reduced pacemaker infections requiring surgery. Routine use of antibiotics is recommended to prevent complications after permanent pacemaker implantation.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Infectious Diseases
- Surgical Infections
Background:
- Pacemaker pocket infections are a serious complication of permanent pacemaker implantation.
- Evidence on the efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis for preventing these infections is conflicting.
- A large prospective randomized trial was conducted to evaluate antibiotic prophylaxis and identify high-risk patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis in preventing pacemaker pocket infections.
- To identify patient-specific risk factors for developing infections after pacemaker implantation.
Main Methods:
- A prospective randomized open trial compared flucloxacillin (or clindamycin for penicillin allergy) with no antibiotic prophylaxis.
- Intravenous antibiotics were administered at implantation and continued for 48 hours.
- The primary endpoint was reoperation for an infective complication.
Main Results:
- In the randomized group, nine infections requiring reoperation occurred, all in the no-antibiotic group (P = 0.003).
- Across the total cohort, 13 infections were observed, with only one in the antibiotic group (P = 0.006).
- Infections were more common with inexperienced operators, prolonged procedures, or repeat operations for non-infective issues.
Conclusions:
- Antibiotic prophylaxis significantly decreased the incidence of infective complications requiring reoperation.
- Routine use of antibiotic prophylaxis is recommended for patients undergoing permanent pacemaker implantation.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Endocarditis III: Medical Management

