Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A mental health capitation program: II. Cost-benefit analysis

S K Reed1, K D Hennessy, O S Mitchell

  • 1Department of Psychiatry, University of Rochester, New York.

Hospital & Community Psychiatry
|November 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Response to Letter to the Editor: Do we have to redefine lameness in the era of quantitative gait analysis.

Equine veterinary journal·2018
Same author

A field test of a model for the stability of androdioecy in the freshwater shrimp, Eulimnadia texana.

Journal of evolutionary biology·2014
Same author

Perceptual vs conceptual categorization.

Memory & cognition·2013
Same author

Structural descriptions and the limitations of visual images*.

Memory & cognition·2013
Same author

Detection of parts in patterns and images.

Memory & cognition·2013
Same author

Comparison of an inertial sensor system of lameness quantification with subjective lameness evaluation.

Equine veterinary journal·2012

The capitated payment system (CPS) improved community mental health services and reduced state hospital use for individuals with serious mental illness. This system showed cost-effectiveness despite higher per-patient expenses in some cases.

Area of Science:

  • Health Services Research
  • Mental Health Policy
  • Economic Evaluation

Background:

  • The Monroe-Livingston demonstration project evaluated a capitated payment system (CPS) for mental health services.
  • Understanding the societal costs and benefits of alternative payment models is crucial for healthcare reform.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the total monetized and nonmonetized costs and benefits of the Monroe-Livingston project's CPS.
  • To compare the economic and service utilization outcomes of CPS with traditional fee-for-service care.

Main Methods:

  • A randomized controlled trial comparing an experimental group (enrolled in CPS) with a control group (fee-for-service).
  • Analysis of two-year outcomes for continuous (comprehensive CPS) and intermittent (partial CPS) patients.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparison of costs, benefits, and service utilization between groups.

    • Main Results:

    • All groups showed psychosocial improvements; continuous CPS patients had less hospitalization but higher costs, increased victimization, and more unsupervised living.
    • Partial CPS patients showed fewer differences compared to controls, with both groups reporting good case management and social support.
    • Annual per-patient costs for continuous CPS patients ranged from $74,000 to over $100,000, primarily due to hospitalization rates.

    Conclusions:

    • The CPS significantly improved community-based services for serious mental illness.
    • The system reduced the reliance on state hospital care.
    • While overall costs varied, the CPS demonstrated a positive impact on service delivery and patient outcomes.