Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 12, 2026

09:13
Protocol for Three-dimensional Confocal Morphometric Analysis of Astrocytes
Published on: December 11, 2015
Size and shape evaluation of astrocytoma nuclei with the shape analytical morphometry software system
R Ricco1, G Serio, D M Caniglia
1Institute of Pathological Anatomy and Histopathology, School of Medicine, University of Bari, Italy.
Analytical and Quantitative Cytology and Histology
|October 1, 1994
Summary
Analytical morphometry effectively distinguished grade 1 astrocytomas from higher grades using nuclear features. However, differentiating between grade 2 and grade 3 astrocytomas based on nuclear size and shape proved challenging.
Area of Science:
- Neuro-oncology
- Quantitative Pathology
- Biomedical Engineering
Background:
- Astrocytomas are primary brain tumors with varying grades of malignancy.
- Accurate grading is crucial for prognosis and treatment planning.
- Morphological analysis offers potential for objective tumor characterization.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the utility of analytical morphometry in discriminating astrocytoma grades (1-3).
- To assess if nuclear size and shape parameters can differentiate malignancy grades.
- To evaluate the effectiveness of quantitative shape analysis in astrocytoma grading.
Main Methods:
- Studied 18 astrocytoma cases (grades 1-3) using analytical morphometry.
- Calculated nuclear dimensional measurements and shape irregularities.
- Quantified nuclear symmetry using the shape asymmetry evaluator.
- Applied univariate and multivariate statistical analyses to morphometric parameters.
Main Results:
- Morphometric parameters clearly distinguished grade 1 astrocytomas from grades 2 and 3.
- Nuclear size and shape parameters showed significant differences for grade 1.
- Grades 2 and 3 astrocytomas exhibited similar nuclear dimensions and shapes, hindering complete discrimination.
Conclusions:
- Analytical morphometry is a valuable tool for distinguishing low-grade (grade 1) astrocytomas.
- Nuclear morphometric features alone are insufficient to reliably differentiate between grade 2 and grade 3 astrocytomas.
- Further research may be needed to identify additional quantitative markers for higher-grade astrocytoma discrimination.

