Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Focus groups: a method for developing consensus guidelines in general practice

H J Fardy1, D Jeffs

  • 1Illawarra General Practice Training Unit, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.

Family Practice
|September 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The impact of travel on cancer patients' experiences of treatment: a literature review.

European journal of cancer care·2002
Same author

Implications of social isolation during cancer treatment. The implications of residence away from home during cancer treatment on patients' experiences: a comparative study.

Health & place·2001
Same author

Moving towards organised care of chronic disease. The 3+ visit plan.

Australian family physician·2001
Same author

Is childhood allergy more common amongst an island population?

The journal of the Royal Society for the Promotion of Health·2001
Same author

Asthma management: still much to do.

The Medical journal of Australia·1999
Same author

The 3+ plan for asthma management.

Australian family physician·1999
Same journal

Universal-offer HIV testing amongst patients undergoing blood tests in primary care: results from a multi-centre study.

Family practice·2026
Same journal

Sustainable healthcare knowledge, experience and curricular perspectives: a cross-sectional survey within the European Young Family Doctors Movement network.

Family practice·2026
Same journal

General practice care models and satisfaction in Australian residential aged care homes: a national survey of GPs, practice nurses, and managers.

Family practice·2026
Same journal

Effect of direct access to physiotherapy on prescribing and imaging in primary care for musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Family practice·2026
Same journal

Virtual and in-person interpretation: a qualitative study from the perspective of professional medical interpreters.

Family practice·2026
Same journal

Temporal changes in chronic disease management in primary care in relation to telehealth policy changes: Australian whole-of-population interrupted time-series analysis.

Family practice·2026
See all related articles

General practitioners (GPs) in Australia developed consensus standards for menopause and asthma care. The focus group process also enhanced quality assurance and medical education for GPs.

Area of Science:

  • General Practice
  • Healthcare Quality Improvement
  • Medical Education

Background:

  • Lack of established quality standards for common clinical situations in Australian general practice.
  • Need for evidence-based guidelines to ensure consistent patient care.
  • Importance of quality measurement in clinical disciplines.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop consensus standards for the management of menopause and asthma in Australian general practice.
  • To evaluate the focus group methodology as a tool for quality assurance and professional development.
  • To address the absence of accepted standards in primary care settings.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized focus (research) group meetings with general practitioners (GPs).
  • Facilitated consensus-building on 'principles of practice' and 'minimal acceptable care'.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Employed a methodology within the General Practice Evaluation Programme.

    • Main Results:

    • Achieved consensus on standards for GP management of menopause and asthma.
    • Identified the focus group process as beneficial for reducing professional isolation.
    • Recognized the methodology's value in promoting quality assurance, peer review, and clinical audit.
    • Highlighted the potential for targeted continuing medical education.

    Conclusions:

    • The focus group methodology is effective for developing clinical practice standards in general practice.
    • The process of standard development offers significant benefits beyond the standards themselves.
    • This approach supports quality improvement and professional development for Australian GPs.