Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Manipulating prefabricated flaps: an experimental study examining flap viability

P K Maitz1, J J Pribaz, C A Hergrueter

  • 1Division of Plastic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115.

Microsurgery
|January 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Clinical profile and recovery pattern of dysphonia following inhalation injury: A 10-year review.

Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries·2024
Same author

The addition of respiratory muscle strength training to facilitate swallow and pulmonary rehabilitation following massive tissue loss and severe deconditioning: A case series.

Australian critical care : official journal of the Confederation of Australian Critical Care Nurses·2021
Same author

Influence of Inhalation Injury on Incidence, Clinical Profile and Recovery Pattern of Dysphagia Following Burn Injury.

Dysphagia·2020
Same author

Early postoperative imaging and image-guided procedures on patients with face transplants.

AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology·2014
Same author

Prefabricated and prelaminated flaps for head and neck reconstruction.

Clinics in plastic surgery·2001
Same author

Thermal injuries to free flaps: better prevented than treated.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2001

Thin prefabricated skin flaps show reduced survival when folded, unlike standard axial pattern flaps. This finding is crucial for reconstructive surgery safety and technique refinement.

Area of Science:

  • Plastic Surgery
  • Regenerative Medicine
  • Biomaterials Science

Background:

  • Flap prefabrication is increasingly used in reconstructive surgery.
  • Custom-fitted flaps are essential for facial esthetics.
  • Limitations of prefabricated flaps require investigation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Compare the safety of manipulating thin prefabricated skin flaps versus axial pattern skin flaps.
  • Evaluate the viability of folded prefabricated flaps.
  • Assess the survival rates of different flap types in a rabbit ear model.

Main Methods:

  • Twenty-seven New Zealand white rabbits were used.
  • Prefabricated and axial pattern skin flaps were folded 180 degrees around the ear edge.
  • Survival rates of folded flaps were compared to controls.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Nonmanipulated flaps were sutured to a straight recipient bed.

    • Main Results:

    • Folded prefabricated flaps showed significantly reduced survival (56%) compared to folded axial pattern flaps (85%), P < 0.005.
    • Nonmanipulated prefabricated flaps and axial pattern flaps demonstrated complete survival.
    • This indicates compromised viability in folded prefabricated flaps.

    Conclusions:

    • Thin prefabricated skin flaps have limitations when manipulated, particularly when folded.
    • Axial pattern flaps are more reliable for complex reconstructions requiring flap folding.
    • Further research is needed to optimize prefabricated flap techniques for clinical application.