The effect of covariates on the induction time of AIDS using improved imputation of exact seroconversion times

K Gauvreau1, V Degruttola, M Pagano

  • 1Harvard School of Public Health, Department of Biostatistics, Boston, Massachusetts 02115.

Statistics in Medicine
|October 15, 1994
PubMed

This paper explores the effects of covariates such as age, gender, chronological time of seroconversion, and mode of virus transmission on the interval between HIV seroconversion and the development of AIDS. For many cohorts which are available to provide information about such effects, both the time of seroconversion and the time of onset of AIDS may be right- or interval-censored. To analyse these doubly-censored data, we propose a method in which we first estimate the marginal distribution of the chronological time of seroconversion and use this distribution to impute the seroconversion time for each subject. Subsequently, we estimate the distribution of induction times conditional on the seroconversion distribution. We apply this technique to a cohort of HIV seropositive subjects recruited from various outpatient facilities throughout Italy and show that age at seroconversion has the greatest effect on induction time.

Related Concept Videos

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies01:27

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This phenomenon...
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and Cox...
Censoring Survival Data01:09

Censoring Survival Data

Survival analysis is a statistical method used to analyze time-to-event data, often employed in fields such as medicine, engineering, and social sciences. One of the key challenges in survival analysis is dealing with incomplete data, a phenomenon known as "censoring." Censoring occurs when the event of interest (such as death, relapse, or system failure) has not occurred for some individuals by the end of the study period or is otherwise unobservable, and it might have many different reasons...