Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Cortical magnification theory fails to predict visual recognition

H Strasburger1, I Rentschler, L O Harvey

  • 1Institute for Medical Psychology, University of Munich, Germany.

The European Journal of Neuroscience
|October 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary

The sense of form is poor in indirect view, but size scaling alone doesn't explain character recognition across the visual field. Both size and contrast must increase for accurate recognition, challenging existing theories.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

[The wettability of leaf surfaces and the submicroscopic structure of their wax].

Planta·2014
Same author

[Electron-microscopical investigation on wax-covered stomatas].

Planta·2014
Same author

Amplitude and phase characteristics of the steady-state visual evoked potential.

Applied optics·2010
Same author

Generalizing the evaluation of medical image processing tools by use of Gabor patterns.

Methods of information in medicine·2009
Same author

[Sighted and blind in one person: a case report and conclusions on the psychoneurobiology of vision].

Der Nervenarzt·2007
Same author

[Methodological principles for optimising functional MR experiments].

Der Radiologe·2005

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Visual Perception
  • Computational Neuroscience

Background:

  • Cortical magnification theory posits that visual field disadvantages are compensated by scaling image size.
  • This theory assumes homogeneous neural circuitry with variable spatial sampling across the visual field.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To challenge the cortical magnification theory for character recognition.
  • To investigate the relationship between visual field, target size, and contrast in character recognition.

Main Methods:

  • Empirical testing of character recognition across the visual field.
  • Formulating a hyperbolic law to describe the relationship between size and contrast.

Main Results:

  • Character recognition is not solely dependent on size scaling.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Both target size and contrast must increase for effective recognition in the visual field.
  • A hyperbolic law (size × log contrast = constant) was identified.

    • Conclusions:

    • Scalar cortical magnification theory is inadequate for explaining character recognition.
    • Character recognition relies on multidimensional pattern representations in higher cortical areas (striate and prestriate).