Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A two-stage validation study for determining sensitivity and specificity

T D Tosteson1, L Titus-Ernstoff, J A Baron

  • 1Department of Community and Family Medicine, Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, New Hampshire 03755.

Environmental Health Perspectives
|November 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Making Statistics Clinically Meaningful.

Clinical epidemiology·2026
Same author

Association between Mediterranean diet and metal mixtures concentrations in pregnant people from the New Hampshire Birth Cohort Study.

The Science of the total environment·2023
Same author

Arsenic exposure in relation to apple consumption among infants in the New Hampshire Birth Cohort Study.

Exposure and health·2020
Same author

Specific class of intrapartum antibiotics relates to maturation of the infant gut microbiota: a prospective cohort study.

BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology·2019
Same author

Risk of basal cell carcinoma in a randomized clinical trial of aspirin and folic acid for the prevention of colorectal adenomas.

The British journal of dermatology·2018
Same author

The implantation effect: delay in seizure occurrence with implantation of intracranial electrodes.

Acta neurologica Scandinavica·2016
Same journal

A New Start.

Environmental health perspectives·2026
Same journal

Time-Varying Exposure to Element Mixtures and Children's Cognition at 5 Years of Age: Findings from the New Hampshire Birth Cohort Study.

Environmental health perspectives·2026
Same journal

Effect of Household Air Pollution on the Gut Microbiome and Virome of Adult Women Living in Uganda.

Environmental health perspectives·2026
Same journal

Comparison of Temperature-Mortality Associations across the Middle East Using Different Exposure Estimation Approaches.

Environmental health perspectives·2026
Same journal

Workflow for Statistical Analysis of Environmental Mixtures.

Environmental health perspectives·2026
Same journal

Effects of Extreme Heat Exposure on Heatstroke and Liver Injury in Mice: The Role of PPARα.

Environmental health perspectives·2026
See all related articles

This study introduces a two-stage method for accurately estimating sensitivity and specificity in diagnostic tests. This approach is particularly useful for validating self-reported atypical nevi as a risk factor for malignant melanoma.

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Self-reported atypical nevi can be a valuable indicator for malignant melanoma risk.
  • Accurate estimation of diagnostic test performance, like sensitivity and specificity, is crucial for reliable risk assessment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present a novel two-stage procedure for estimating sensitivity and specificity.
  • To apply this method to validate self-reported atypical nevi in malignant melanoma research.

Main Methods:

  • A two-stage sampling design: initial classification by test measure, followed by a stratified subsample for gold standard confirmation.
  • Utilizing missing data techniques for contingency tables to estimate joint distributions.
  • Deriving maximum likelihood and efficient estimators for sensitivity and specificity.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • The proposed method provides efficient estimators for sensitivity and specificity.
  • Asymptotic coefficients of variation were calculated to evaluate different second-stage sampling strategies.

Conclusions:

  • The described two-stage procedure offers a robust framework for estimating diagnostic accuracy.
  • This method enhances the validation of self-reported measures in epidemiological studies, specifically for melanoma risk factors.