Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The practice of meta-analysis

J C Bailar1

  • 1Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
|January 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Meta-analysis is useful for specific research scenarios with high-quality data and expert analysis. However, improper application can yield misleading results, as shown in five case studies.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A call for an international ban on asbestos.

Public health reviews·2002
Same author

Associations between daily cause-specific mortality and concentrations of ground-level ozone in Montreal, Quebec.

American journal of epidemiology·2001
Same author

Identification of persons with cardiorespiratory conditions who are at risk of dying from the acute effects of ambient air particles.

Environmental health perspectives·2001
Same author

The association between daily mortality and ambient air particle pollution in Montreal, Quebec. 1. Nonaccidental mortality.

Environmental research·2001
Same author

The association between daily mortality and ambient air particle pollution in Montreal, Quebec. 2. Cause-specific mortality.

Environmental research·2001
Same author

The powerful placebo and the Wizard of Oz.

The New England journal of medicine·2001

Area of Science:

  • Evidence synthesis
  • Biostatistics
  • Medical research methodology

Background:

  • Meta-analysis combines results from multiple studies to provide a more robust estimate of treatment effects.
  • The validity of meta-analysis depends heavily on the quality of the primary studies and the homogeneity of their findings.
  • Potential biases and limitations can arise from inappropriate application or interpretation of meta-analytic results.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the appropriate use of meta-analysis in medical research.
  • To identify specific conditions under which meta-analysis is most reliable.
  • To highlight the risks of misleading conclusions from poorly conducted meta-analyses.

Main Methods:

  • Review of methodological principles for effective meta-analysis.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of five distinct case studies illustrating both appropriate and inappropriate uses of meta-analysis.
  • Examination of factors influencing the reliability of meta-analytic findings.

    • Main Results:

    • Meta-analysis is valuable when primary literature is high-quality, heterogeneity is minimal and understood, a specific outcome parameter is key, and the analyst possesses deep subject expertise.
    • Inappropriate meta-analytic applications can lead to seriously misleading conclusions.
    • Case studies demonstrate varied outcomes depending on the carefulness of the meta-analytic approach.

    Conclusions:

    • Meta-analysis serves a valuable role in evidence synthesis when applied judiciously in well-defined circumstances.
    • Researchers must exercise caution and possess significant expertise to avoid the pitfalls of meta-analysis.
    • The presented case studies underscore the critical importance of methodological rigor in meta-analysis.