On a model-based approach to estimating efficacy in clinical trials
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 6, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
Published on: September 16, 2022
1Biostatistics Research Branch, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Bethesda, MD 20892.
Abstract:
Treatment efficacy is of primary importance in phase III clinical trials. Determining the true size of the treatment effect is often complicated by patient non-compliance with the regimen. This paper examines a model-based approach in the spirit of Efron and Feldman utilizing drug and placebo compliance information. One of the assumptions of this analysis is 'comparability' of drug and placebo compliance. Robustness in estimation of subgroup and population treatment effects when this assumption is violated is investigated in a simulation study. We find that even moderate non-comparability (for example, normalized compliance correlations of 0.4) may produce severely biased estimates. The basis is modulated by the strength of the relationship between compliance and the response on placebo.
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Pharmacodynamic Models: Linear Concentration–Effect Model
Pharmacodynamic Models: Direct Effect Model and Indirect Response Model
Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions
Kaplan-Meier Approach

