Related Experiment Videos
Issues in the use of cochlear implants with prelingually deaf children
American Annals of the Deaf
|December 1, 1994
Summary
Cochlear implants show improved hearing thresholds in deaf children, but independent data on their success is limited. Further research is needed to understand the full impact on speech processing and language acquisition.
Area of Science:
- Audiology
- Pediatric Medicine
- Speech-Language Pathology
Background:
- Cochlear implants are FDA-approved for deaf adults and children over two.
- Independent evaluative documentation supporting cochlear implant success is lacking.
- Previous studies show improved hearing thresholds but not necessarily speech processing capabilities.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness of cochlear implants in profoundly deaf children.
- To compare hearing thresholds in children with and without cochlear implants.
- To examine the theoretical rationale and potential limitations of early cochlear implantation in prelingually deaf children.
Main Methods:
- Comparison of unaided and aided hearing thresholds in profoundly deaf children.
- Analysis of hearing thresholds with cochlear implants versus conventional hearing aids.
- Review of Lennenberg's critical stage theory in the context of prelingual deafness and cochlear implantation.
Main Results:
- Children with cochlear implants showed an improvement in unaided hearing thresholds from 109.8 dB to 56.0 dB.
- Children with conventional aids showed an improvement from 105.1 dB to 61.8 dB.
- Achieved pure tone thresholds do not guarantee speech processing ability at that level.
Conclusions:
- The success of cochlear implants requires more independent validation.
- The critical stage theory's application to prelingually deaf children receiving implants may be flawed regarding second language acquisition.
- Parents should consider both benefits and potential concerns regarding experimental cochlear implantation in prelingually deaf children.