Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Dermatology examination performance: wide variation between different teaching centres

A Y Finlay1, E C Coles, R P Dawber

  • 1Department of Dermatology, University of Wales College of Medicine, Cardiff, UK.

Medical Education
|July 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Suicidal ideation in patients with skin conditions: A multicentre European study.

Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV·2026
Same author

Dementia and Its Profound Impact on Family Members and Partners: A Large UK Cross-Sectional Study.

Alzheimer disease and associated disorders·2024
Same author

The Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) used as the benchmark in validation of 101 quality-of-life instruments: A systematic review.

Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV·2024
Same author

A cross-sectional study on gender differences in body dysmorphic concerns in patients with skin conditions in relation to sociodemographic, clinical and psychological variables.

Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV·2024
Same author

Quality of life measurement in urticaria: Position statement of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology Task Forces on Quality of Life and Patient-Oriented Outcomes and Urticaria and Angioedema.

Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV·2024
Same author

Measurement of the major ignored burden of multiple myeloma, pernicious anaemia and of other haematological conditions on partners and family members: A cross-sectional study.

European journal of haematology·2024
Same journal

Channelling Socrates to re-imagine asynchronous online learning.

Medical education·2026
Same journal

Moving beyond tokenism: A structured and intentional approach to embedding health advocacy in medical education.

Medical education·2026
Same journal

When I say … 'in situ simulation'.

Medical education·2026
Same journal

Examiner training and calibration for simulated clinical examinations: A scoping review.

Medical education·2026
Same journal

When systems set the limits of supervision.

Medical education·2026
Same journal

From psychometrics to partnerships: Broadening what counts as validity evidence.

Medical education·2026
See all related articles

Medical students

Area of Science:

  • Medical Education
  • Dermatology Training
  • Assessment Methods

Background:

  • Dermatology education is crucial for clinical medical students.
  • Standardized assessments are needed to evaluate teaching effectiveness.
  • Variability in student performance highlights potential disparities in educational quality.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the effectiveness of dermatology teaching across multiple universities.
  • To identify areas of strength and weakness in the current dermatology curriculum.
  • To assess the utility of a standardized multiple-choice question (MCQ) examination for feedback.

Main Methods:

  • A 50-question MCQ dermatology examination was administered to 301 clinical medical students across four universities.
  • Student performance was analyzed, comparing groups with and without additional teaching.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Scores were analyzed by subject area and by university to identify performance variations.

    • Main Results:

    • Students receiving additional dermatology teaching demonstrated improved performance.
    • Significant score improvements were observed after dermatology teaching interventions (P < 0.001).
    • Performance varied significantly between centers, with lowest scores in specific subject areas at lower-performing institutions.

    Conclusions:

    • Standardized dermatology examinations provide valuable feedback on teaching quality.
    • Targeted interventions and curriculum adjustments can enhance student learning outcomes.
    • Identifying high-discriminatory questions aids in refining future assessments and improving dermatology education.