Cortical cerebral blood flow cycling: anesthesia and arterial blood pressure

Cycling of various cerebral metabolic substances, arterial vascular diameter, and flow has been noted by many workers at a frequency near 0.1 Hz. Suspicion that this phenomenon is dependent on the type of anesthesia led us to investigate the occurrence of cerebral blood flow (CBF) cycling with different anesthetics. Fifteen Sprague-Dawley rats were anesthetized with either pentobarbital (n = 5, 40-50 mg/kg), alpha-chloralose (n = 5, 60 mg/kg), or halothane (n = 5, 1-0.5%). Body temperature was maintained at 37 degrees C. Femoral arterial and venous catheters were placed, and a tracheotomy was performed, permitting artificial ventilation with 30% O2-70% N2. A closed cranial window was formed over a 3-mm diameter craniotomy. Mean arterial pressure (MABP), arterial partial pressures of CO2 and O2 (PaCO2 and PaO2), and pH were controlled and stabilized at normal values. CBF was determined using laser Doppler flowmetry. To induce cycling, MABP was transiently and repeatedly lowered by exsanguination. Fast Fourier analysis of selected 64-s flow recordings (n = 38) was performed. CBF cycling was observed, independent of the type of anesthesia, in all animals. In 36 epochs, cycling was induced when MABP was reduced to a mean pressure of 65 +/- 1.5 mmHg. The mean frequency and amplitude were 0.094 +/- 0.003 Hz and 6.6 +/- 0.5%, respectively. Cycling occurred without blood withdrawal in two epochs. With the use of the blood-withdrawal epochs (n = 36), all three anesthetics shared a common linear slope between amplitude and blood pressure (P < 0.02) and blood pressure change (P < 0.01). Pentobarbital differed from alpha-chloralose and halothane in the relation between cycling frequency and blood pressure. Only pentobarbital exhibited correlation between frequency and blood pressure (P < 0.02) and blood pressure change (P < 0.001). The occurrence of these oscillations is not related to the type of anesthesia, and they usually occur at MABP values that are near or just above the lower limit of autoregulation. At this pressure level, CBF oscillations would suggest that vasoconstrictive and dilatory forces are no longer in balance, but alternatively vying for control.