Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Digital skin temperature and biofeedback

D L Grimsley1

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of North Carolina at Charlotte 28223.

Perceptual and Motor Skills
|December 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Upper washita river experimental watersheds: meteorologic and soil climate measurement networks.

Journal of environmental quality·2015
Same author

The neurophysiological aspects of Pavlov's theory of higher nervous activity: in honor of the 150th anniversary of Pavlov's birth.

Journal of the history of the neurosciences·2001
Same author

Bilateral skin temperature, handedness, and the biofeedback control of skin temperature.

Journal of behavioral medicine·1996
Same author

Effects of experience with salty food on salt selection in adrenalectomized rats.

Integrative physiological and behavioral science : the official journal of the Pavlovian Society·1994
Same author

Pavlov's position on the effects of decortication on conditional reflexes.

Integrative physiological and behavioral science : the official journal of the Pavlovian Society·1992
Same author

Nicotine effects on biofeedback training.

Journal of behavioral medicine·1990
Same journal

Theoretical and Psychological Mechanisms of Perceptual-Motor Learning in AI Bots-Assisted Art Education.

Perceptual and motor skills·2026
Same journal

Development and Measurement Properties of a Custom-Built Punch Force Dynamometer Based on S-Type Load Cells.

Perceptual and motor skills·2026
Same journal

Do Elite Taekwondo Athletes Invest Time for Better Choices? Analysis of Anticipatory Behavior Through a Perception-Action Coupling Task.

Perceptual and motor skills·2026
Same journal

Multisensory Contributions in Joint Actions: A Scoping Review.

Perceptual and motor skills·2026
Same journal

Proprioceptive Impairment and Joint Position Exposure Time in Relation to Patient-Report Outcome With Chronic Ankle Instability.

Perceptual and motor skills·2026
Same journal

Static Tactical Diagrams and Imagination: Differential Effects on Novice and Expert Handball Players.

Perceptual and motor skills·2026
See all related articles

This study found that biofeedback successfully warmed both the index and little fingers equally. No significant temperature difference was observed between the fingers after the hand warming session.

Area of Science:

  • Physiology
  • Biofeedback
  • Thermoregulation

Background:

  • Hand warming is crucial for various activities and conditions.
  • Biofeedback offers a potential method for voluntary thermoregulation.
  • Comparing differential finger warming responses is important for understanding localized temperature control.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the skin temperature changes in the index and little fingers during a biofeedback-assisted hand warming task.
  • To determine if voluntary control via biofeedback can selectively increase skin temperature in a targeted finger.
  • To assess the overall effectiveness of biofeedback in promoting hand warming.

Main Methods:

  • Simultaneous skin temperature recording of the index and little fingers.

Related Experiment Videos

  • A 5-minute baseline recording period.
  • A 10-minute biofeedback session using auditory and visual cues to guide subjects in warming their index finger.

    • Main Results:

    • No statistically significant difference in skin temperature was found between the index and little fingers.
    • A significant increase in skin temperature was observed in both the index and little fingers during the biofeedback session.
    • The biofeedback intervention was effective in raising overall hand skin temperature.

    Conclusions:

    • Biofeedback-assisted hand warming is effective in increasing skin temperature in both targeted and non-targeted fingers.
    • The study suggests a systemic or interconnected response in hand thermoregulation rather than isolated finger control.
    • Further research could explore the mechanisms behind this generalized warming response.