Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Preference testing: a comparison of two presentation methods

J Windsor1, L M Piché, P A Locke

  • 1Department of Communication Disorders, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis 55455.

Research in Developmental Disabilities
|November 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A cross-cultural study translating and validating the COMPAT-SF pain questionnaire in Telugu, Bengali and Hindi.

Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology·2025
Same author

A decision support tool for the detection of pancreatic cancer in general practice: A modified Delphi consensus.

Pancreatology : official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) ... [et al.]·2021
Same author

International consensus guidelines for surgery and the timing of intervention in chronic pancreatitis.

Pancreatology : official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) ... [et al.]·2019
Same author

Effect of the F129L Mutation in Alternaria solani on Fungicides Affecting Mitochondrial Respiration.

Plant disease·2019
Same author

NCRP Program Area Committee 7: Radiation Education, Risk Communication, Outreach, and Policy.

Health physics·2015
Same author

Building a sustainable clinical academic workforce to meet the future healthcare needs of Australia and New Zealand: report from the first summit meeting.

Internal medicine journal·2015
Same journal

Short report: Patterns of motor difficulties among autistic, ADHD, or Autistic-ADHD youth in Iceland.

Research in developmental disabilities·2026
Same journal

Understanding coaches' perspectives on sport as a driver of employability-related soft skills in athletes with intellectual disabilities.

Research in developmental disabilities·2026
Same journal

Differential effects of physical activity interventions on gross and fine motor difficulties in children with autism spectrum disorder: Insights from a multilevel meta-analysis with moderator analyses.

Research in developmental disabilities·2026
Same journal

Does parenting stress affect marital quality among parents of children with disabilities? Evidence from a meta-analysis.

Research in developmental disabilities·2026
Same journal

"Others Decide for Us": Recommendations became restrictions in services for people with intellectual disability in Sweden.

Research in developmental disabilities·2026
Same journal

The effectiveness of a video-modeling-based treatment package for incontinence in children with and without developmental disabilities.

Research in developmental disabilities·2026
See all related articles

Preference testing for individuals with severe-profound developmental disabilities showed similar results between paired and group methods. Paired testing provided more consistent data, though staff rankings did not strongly correlate with either method.

Area of Science:

  • Developmental Disabilities
  • Special Education
  • Assistive Technology

Background:

  • Effective preference assessment is crucial for individuals with severe-profound developmental disabilities.
  • Understanding learner preferences can enhance engagement and learning outcomes.
  • Current preference assessment methods require evaluation for efficacy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the effectiveness of paired and group presentation methods in preference testing.
  • To assess the correlation between presentation methods and staff rankings of preferences.
  • To identify reliable methods for determining preferences in learners with severe-profound developmental disabilities.

Main Methods:

  • Eight learners with severe-profound developmental disabilities participated in the study.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Preference testing was conducted using both paired and group presentation methods.
  • Learner preferences were also compared against staff rankings.

    • Main Results:

    • Both paired and group presentation methods identified similar learner preferences.
    • The paired presentation method yielded more consistent preference data than the group method.
    • Staff preference rankings showed low correlation with both presentation methods, though top preferences overlapped.

    Conclusions:

    • Paired presentation is a more consistent method for preference assessment in this population.
    • Staff rankings may not accurately reflect learner preferences independently.
    • Further research is needed to refine preference assessment strategies for individuals with severe-profound developmental disabilities.