Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 12, 2026

Detection of Invasive Pulmonary Aspergillosis in Haematological Malignancy Patients by using Lateral-flow Technology
Published on: March 22, 2012
[Curative treatment of invasive aspergillosis]
1Institut Pasteur, Hôpital et Unité de Mycologie, Paris, France.
Abstract:
Invasive aspergillosis is an opportunist infection in immunosuppressed hosts among the most difficult to diagnose and to treat. A wide variety of clinical forms exist which may not require the same treatment for each of them. Intravenous amphotericin B and itraconazole are the only available antifungal agents. Amphotericin B is often considered as the gold standard treatment despite its high toxicity particularly with high dosage (1-1.5 mg/kg/day) and its poor results namely in bone marrow transplant recipients. Lipidic amphotericin B is less toxic allowing administration of higher dose however relevant data are limited. Itraconazole is an excellent anti Aspergillus antifungal with low toxicity, however there is a wide intersubject variation in intestinal absorption. It may represent a valuable alternative to amphotericin B in case of intolerance or as a relay treatment and possibly in some cases as a first choice treatment. More studies are necessary particularly in granulopenic patients. Comparative study are urgently needed between both drugs and with new molecules to indicate the best treatment according to the clinical form. The use of hematopoietic growth factors and surgery may improve the outcome.
Insights
Invasive aspergillosis treatment is challenging. Itraconazole offers a potentially safer alternative to amphotericin B, but more comparative studies are needed for optimal patient care.
Area of Science:
- Mycology
- Infectious Diseases
- Pharmacology
Context:
- Invasive aspergillosis is a serious opportunistic infection in immunocompromised individuals.
- Current treatment options, intravenous amphotericin B and itraconazole, have limitations.
- Treatment strategies must be tailored to the diverse clinical presentations of the infection.
Purpose:
- To review the current treatment landscape for invasive aspergillosis.
- To compare the efficacy and toxicity profiles of amphotericin B and itraconazole.
- To identify areas for future research and clinical trials.
Summary:
- Amphotericin B is the standard treatment but carries significant toxicity, especially at high doses, with suboptimal outcomes in certain populations like bone marrow transplant recipients.
- Lipid formulations of amphotericin B show reduced toxicity, but data on their efficacy is limited.
- Itraconazole, an effective anti-Aspergillus agent with lower toxicity, exhibits variable absorption, making it a potential alternative or first-line option in specific cases.
- Further research, particularly comparative studies involving granulopenic patients and new antifungal agents, is crucial.
Impact:
- Highlights the need for personalized treatment approaches for invasive aspergillosis.
- Emphasizes the potential role of itraconazole as a viable alternative to amphotericin B.
- Underscores the necessity for comparative clinical trials to guide optimal antifungal selection.
- Suggests that adjunct therapies like hematopoietic growth factors and surgery may improve patient outcomes.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Drugs for Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis in IBD
Pulmonary Tuberculosis V
Latent tuberculosis infection occurs when TB bacteria are present in a person's body, but are not causing illness or symptoms. It is not contagious, and preventive treatment is crucial to avoid the progression...
Fungal Phylum Ascomycota
Cryptococcal Meningitis
Antifungal Agents
Antiprotozoal Agents

