Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Processing of auditory deviants with changes in one versus two stimulus dimensions

E Schröger1

  • 1Institute of Psychology, University of Munich, Germany.

Psychophysiology
|January 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Spatial auditory regularity encoding and prediction: Human middle-latency and long-latency auditory evoked potentials.

Brain research·2015
Same author

A neural mechanism for involuntary attention shifts to changes in auditory stimulation.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2013
Same author

Involuntary attentional capture by speech and non-speech deviations: a combined behavioral-event-related potential study.

Brain research·2012
Same author

Spectrotemporal processing drives fast access to memory traces for spoken words.

NeuroImage·2012
Same author

Top-down modulation of auditory processing: effects of sound context, musical expertise and attentional focus.

The European journal of neuroscience·2009
Same author

Selective tuning of cortical sound-feature processing by language experience.

The European journal of neuroscience·2006

Auditory event-related potentials (ERPs) reveal that the mismatch negativity (MMN) response to combined frequency and location changes is independent. However, conscious detection of these changes involves non-independent neural processes.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Auditory Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Neuroscience

Background:

  • Auditory event-related potentials (ERPs) are crucial for understanding auditory processing.
  • Mismatch negativity (MMN) reflects automatic neural responses to auditory changes.
  • Investigating the neural basis of auditory perception and attention is essential.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the neural mechanisms underlying the processing of auditory changes.
  • To differentiate between automatic (MMN) and attention-dependent (N2b, P3) responses to auditory deviance.
  • To examine whether the processing of frequency and location changes is independent.

Main Methods:

  • Recording auditory event-related potentials (ERPs) from the human scalp.
  • Presenting standard tones and deviants varying in frequency, location, or both.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparing ERPs in auditory 'ignore' and 'attend' conditions.

    • Main Results:

    • In the ignore condition, the two-dimensional deviant elicited an enhanced mismatch negativity (MMN) compared to one-dimensional deviants.
    • The MMN response to the two-dimensional deviant could be modeled by summing the responses to one-dimensional deviants, suggesting independent neural generators.
    • In the attend condition, deviance-related ERP effects in the N2b and P3 range were not additive, indicating non-independent processing.

    Conclusions:

    • Automatic processing of frequency and location changes, as reflected by MMN, likely involves independent neural populations.
    • Conscious detection of combined auditory changes involves integrated neural processes, not independent ones.
    • These findings shed light on the distinct neural mechanisms of automatic and attention-dependent auditory change detection.