Related Experiment Videos
[Artifacts in magnetic resonance angiography]
A Carriero1, N Magarelli, L Tamburri
1Istituto di Scienze Radiologiche, Università G. D'Annunzio, Chieti.
Unlabelled:
This study was aimed at assessing and classifying the incidence of Magnetic Resonance Angiography (MRA) artifacts using the 2D and 3D time-of-flight (TOF) technique.
Materials And Methods:
from 300 MRA examinations performed January 1991 through April 1993, we selected the first 10 examinations for each vascular region which exhibited an artifact. Many kinds of artifacts were considered, i.e., hardware, sequence, magnetic susceptibility, patient and maximum intensity projection (MIP) artifacts. A superconductive 1.5-T magnet (Magnetom, Siemens) was used, with 2D and 3D TOF acquisitions.
Results:
the quantitative analysis of artifact frequency showed that in the intracranial vessels (2D and 3D TOF sequences) the most common artifacts are saturation (30%) and magnetic susceptibility (30%) artifacts. As for neck vessels (3D TOF sequences), turbulence (40%) and lack of inclusion (30%) artifacts are the most common ones. In thoracic vessels (2D TOF sequences), MIP (50%) and ghost (30%) artifacts are the most common ones, while in the abdominal aorta (2D TOF sequences) magnetic susceptibility (20%), voluntary movement (20%), peristalsis (20%) and MIP (20%) artifacts occurred most frequently. Saturation (30%) and respiratory movement (30%) artifacts were the most common ones in the study of the renal arteries (3D TOF sequences), while MIP artifacts prevailed (40%) in the inferior vena cava (2D TOF sequences). Finally, MIP (40%) and patient movement (30%) artifacts were the most frequent ones in the study of the lower limbs (2 TOF sequences).
Conclusions:
in 2D and 3D TOF studies, being familiar with artifacts and their physical principles helps avoid image misinterpretation so that, if no technical means can prevent an artifact from occurring, at least it will not become a diagnostic pitfall.
Insights
This study assessed Magnetic Resonance Angiography (MRA) artifacts using 2D and 3D time-of-flight (TOF) techniques. Familiarity with common artifacts like saturation and MIP helps prevent misinterpretation in MRA imaging.
Area of Science:
- Radiology
- Medical Imaging
- Diagnostic Techniques
Background:
- Magnetic Resonance Angiography (MRA) is crucial for vascular imaging.
- Artifacts can compromise the diagnostic quality of MRA scans.
- Understanding artifact incidence is key to improving MRA interpretation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess and classify the frequency of artifacts in 2D and 3D time-of-flight (TOF) MRA.
- To identify common artifact types across different vascular regions.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of 300 MRA examinations (January 1991 - April 1993).
- Selection of the first 10 examinations with artifacts per vascular region.
- Inclusion of hardware, sequence, magnetic susceptibility, patient, and MIP artifacts.
Main Results:
- Intracranial vessels: Saturation and magnetic susceptibility (30% each).
- Neck vessels: Turbulence (40%) and lack of inclusion (30%).
- Thoracic vessels: MIP (50%) and ghost (30%).
- Abdominal aorta: MIP, voluntary movement, peristalsis, and magnetic susceptibility (20% each).
- Renal arteries: Saturation and respiratory movement (30% each).
- Inferior vena cava: MIP (40%).
- Lower limbs: MIP (40%) and patient movement (30%).
Conclusions:
- Artifacts vary significantly by vascular region and TOF sequence (2D/3D).
- Common artifacts include saturation, magnetic susceptibility, MIP, turbulence, and movement-related issues.
- Knowledge of artifact types and principles aids in avoiding diagnostic pitfalls in MRA.