Related Experiment Videos
Understanding differences between high and low childhood accident rate areas: the importance of qualitative data
G Sparks1, M A Craven, C Worth
1Behavioural Sciences Division, School of Human and Health Sciences, University of Huddersfield, Queensgate.
Background:
The research discussed in the paper was undertaken for a District Health Authority to aid the development of appropriate policies to achieve the Health of the nation strategic target for reducing the death rate from accidents amongst children under 15. There has been a great deal of quantitative and epidemiological research into childhood accidents which has demonstrated a clear social class gradient in childhood accidents, fatalities and injuries. Less research has been undertaken into the possible reasons for the 'social patterning' of accidents and other aspects of health. Recent sociological research on childhood accidents has adopted a more qualitative approach and studied childhood safety within a family and community context. This approach has been used in the Huddersfield study on parental perspectives on childhood safety.
Methods:
In-depth interviews were held with a sample of parents from a high and a low childhood accident rate area.
Results:
The two focus areas reveal contrasting social profiles. There were significant differences on a number of aspects of parental perceptions on safety and beliefs about accidents, in the two areas. Analysis of accident events revealed that all the families in the high childhood accident rate area sample had children who had had an accident in the past which required hospital treatment. A high proportion of their children had experienced 'near misses'. In contrast, half the families in the low childhood accident rate area had children who had experienced an accident in the past and a much smaller proportion had experienced 'near misses'. All the parents in the sample from both areas developed rules, routines and practices to keep their children safe. The study suggests that there are social class differences in the effective use of these safety rules.
Conclusion:
Qualitatively orientated sociological research into parental perspectives on childhood safety contributes to an understanding of the reasons for the social patterning of childhood accidents. Such information should be of help to professionals in their prevention and safety promotion work.