Related Experiment Videos
An initial experience with lighted ureteral catheters during laparoscopic colectomy
1Ferguson-Blodgett Digestive Disease Institute, Grand Rapids, Michigan.
Summary
Lighted ureteral catheters (LUC) enhance ureteral identification in laparoscopic surgery. While LUC use increased operative time, it did not significantly raise costs or complications in this study.
Area of Science:
- Urology
- Minimally Invasive Surgery
- Surgical Oncology
Background:
- Ureteral injuries are a risk during pelvic dissection, especially in laparoscopic surgery where tactile feedback is limited.
- Lighted ureteral catheters (LUC) offer visual feedback for ureteral identification in laparoscopic procedures.
- The use of LUC in laparoscopic-assisted colectomy has been largely anecdotal.
Purpose of the Study:
- To present the first series of selectively used LUC during laparoscopic-assisted colectomy.
- To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of LUC in this surgical setting.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective review of 49 consecutive laparoscopic-assisted colectomies was conducted.
- Patients were divided into two groups: those who received LUC (n=24) and those who did not (n=25).
- Data collected included catheter visualization, operative time, operating room cost, and complications.
Main Results:
- LUC were visualized in 83% of cases where they were used in right and left colectomies.
- No catheter or ureteral complications occurred in either group.
- Operative time was significantly longer in the LUC group (192 min vs. 161.4 min), but operating room costs were similar.
Conclusions:
- Selective use of LUC in laparoscopic-assisted colectomy can enhance ureteral identification.
- While LUC increases operative time, it does not significantly increase operating room costs or operative morbidity.
- Further investigation into the benefits of LUC for preventing ureteral injuries in complex laparoscopic pelvic surgery is warranted.