Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The learning curve for laparoscopic cholecystectomy

B Cagir1, M Rangraj, L Maffuci

  • 1Department of Surgery, New Rochelle Hospital Medical Center, New York.

Journal of Laparoendoscopic Surgery
|December 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary

Surgeons performing laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) show improved outcomes with experience. High-volume surgeons had lower conversion rates and shorter operative times, indicating a defined learning curve for LC proficiency.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Colorectal cancer staging and adjuvant chemotherapy.

Expert opinion on pharmacotherapy·2001
Same author

Strictureplasty for Crohn's disease: meta-analysis.

Diseases of the colon and rectum·2000
Same author

Guanylyl cyclase C messenger RNA is a biomarker for recurrent stage II colorectal cancer.

Annals of internal medicine·1999
Same author

Changing epidemiology of anorectal melanoma.

Diseases of the colon and rectum·1999
Same author

Adenosquamous carcinoma of the colon, rectum, and anus: epidemiology, distribution, and survival characteristics.

Diseases of the colon and rectum·1999
Same author

Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS).

Heart & lung : the journal of critical care·1999

Area of Science:

  • Surgical Innovation
  • Medical Education
  • Gastrointestinal Surgery

Background:

  • Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has become widely adopted since its introduction in 1987.
  • Concerns exist regarding surgeon training and the learning curve associated with laparoscopic procedures.
  • Evaluating surgical performance metrics is crucial for establishing proficiency standards.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To retrospectively analyze the learning curve for laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC).
  • To assess the impact of surgeon experience on conversion rates, operative times, and complication rates.
  • To identify key performance indicators for achieving proficiency in LC.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective review of 416 consecutive cholecystectomy cases performed by eight surgeons.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of 374 laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) cases and 42 conversions to open cholecystectomy (CONV).
  • Evaluation of conversion rates, operative times, and complication data stratified by surgeon volume and case number.

    • Main Results:

    • High-volume surgeons (A and B) demonstrated significantly lower initial conversion rates (17% and 14%) that decreased with experience (4% and 3%).
    • Operative times for high-volume surgeons improved significantly with experience (e.g., Surgeon A: 97 min to 74 min, p=0.01).
    • Most complications (75%) occurred within the first 30 cases across all surgeons, indicating an early learning phase.

    Conclusions:

    • A distinct learning curve exists for laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), characterized by decreasing conversion rates and operative times with increasing surgeon experience.
    • High-volume surgeons achieve proficiency faster and exhibit superior outcomes.
    • Surgical training programs should emphasize supervised experience to mitigate early complications and optimize LC performance.