Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Implications of motion detection for early non-linearities

A M Derrington1, G B Henning

  • 1Department of Physiological Sciences, Medical School, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.

Ciba Foundation Symposium
|January 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary

The human visual system analyzes motion using non-linear transformations, especially for contrast-modulated patterns. This suggests specialized mechanisms distinct from luminance-based motion analysis, though some elements may overlap.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Sensory thresholds obtained from MEG data: cortical psychometric functions.

NeuroImage·2012
Same author

Two-dimensional pattern motion analysis uses local features.

Vision research·2012
Same author

Masking effect produced by Mach bands on the detection of narrow bars of random polarity.

Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision·2004
Same author

The effect of stimulus height on visual discrimination in horses.

Journal of animal science·2003
Same author

Behaviour of marmoset monkeys in a T-maze: comparison with rats and macaque monkeys on a spatial delayed non-match to sample task.

Experimental brain research·2003
Same author

Contrast discrimination with pulse trains in pink noise.

Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision·2002

Area of Science:

  • Visual perception
  • Neuroscience
  • Computational vision

Background:

  • Motion analysis is typically explained by spatiotemporal variations in luminance.
  • Contrast-modulated patterns, with varying contrast levels, pose challenges for traditional motion analysis models.
  • The human visual system's ability to perceive motion in contrast-modulated patterns implies underlying non-linear mechanisms.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the mechanisms behind the human visual system's motion analysis of contrast-modulated patterns.
  • To determine if the observed non-linearity is intrinsic to sensory transduction or specific to motion analysis mechanisms.
  • To compare the spatial and temporal characteristics of motion discrimination for luminance versus contrast-modulated patterns.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of motion perception using spatiotemporal variations.
  • Presentation of moving contrast-modulated patterns to human observers.
  • Comparison of motion discrimination performance across different pattern types and spatial/temporal parameters.
  • Review of recent physiological evidence related to visual motion processing.

Main Results:

  • Standard motion analysis based on luminance variations is insufficient for contrast-modulated patterns.
  • Non-linear transformations are necessary to analyze motion in contrast-modulated patterns, generating a distortion product.
  • Comparisons suggest distinct mechanisms for luminance and contrast-modulated motion analysis, despite potential shared elements.

Conclusions:

  • The human visual system employs non-linear transformations for analyzing the motion of contrast-modulated patterns.
  • The findings suggest specialized mechanisms for contrast-modulated motion analysis, potentially separate from luminance-based pathways.
  • Further research is needed to fully elucidate the nature and extent of shared versus distinct mechanisms in visual motion perception.

Related Experiment Videos