Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Common properties of visual segmentation

H C Nothdurft1

  • 1Department of Neurobiology, Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, Göttingen, Germany.

Ciba Foundation Symposium
|January 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Neurons with large bilateral receptive fields in monkey prelunate gyrus.

Experimental brain research·2001
Same author

Salience from feature contrast: variations with texture density.

Vision research·2000
Same author

Response profiles to texture border patterns in area V1.

Visual neuroscience·2000
Same author

Focal attention in visual search.

Vision research·1999
Same author

Neuronal responses to orientation and motion contrast in cat striate cortex.

Visual neuroscience·1999
Same author

Cueing and pop-out.

Vision research·1999
Same journal

Precision agriculture: spatial and temporal variability of environmental quality. General reflections.

Ciba Foundation symposium·1997
Same journal

Uncertainty in hydrogeological modelling.

Ciba Foundation symposium·1997
Same journal

Optimal mapping of site-specific multivariate soil properties.

Ciba Foundation symposium·1997
Same journal

Modelling for precision weed management.

Ciba Foundation symposium·1997
Same journal

GIS support for precision agriculture: problems and possibilities.

Ciba Foundation symposium·1997
Same journal

Spatial sampling.

Ciba Foundation symposium·1997
See all related articles

Visual segmentation relies on detecting local feature differences, not global similarities. This mechanism, crucial for distinguishing textures and motion, is enhanced by increased feature contrast at borders.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Computational Vision
  • Psychophysics

Background:

  • Texture segmentation experiments reveal key insights into neuronal mechanisms.
  • Segmentation primarily uses local differences across texture borders, not global similarities.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To discuss the underlying neuronal mechanisms of visual segmentation.
  • To explore the role of local feature contrast in perceptual segregation.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of psychophysical experiments on texture segmentation.
  • Comparison of segmentation properties across different visual cues (orientation, motion, color, luminance, disparity).

Main Results:

  • Segmentation relies on local, orientation contrast-sensitive mechanisms, akin to retinal lateral inhibition.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Orientation differences at texture borders must increase with background orientation variation for segmentation.
  • Similar principles apply to motion, color, luminance, and binocular disparity segmentation.

    • Conclusions:

    • Visual segmentation is driven by local feature contrast.
    • A general mechanism involving feature contrast likely underlies perceptual segregation across various visual clues.