Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

The hidden science of eugenics

D B Paul¹, H G Spencer

¹Department of Political Science, University of Massachusetts, Boston 02125.

|March 23, 1995

Summary

Early eugenicists lacked modern social values, not intelligence. Understanding the eugenics movement

Related Experiment Videos

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Contrasting biogeographical patterns in Margarella (Gastropoda: Calliostomatidae: Margarellinae) across the Antarctic Polar Front.

Molecular phylogenetics and evolution·2020

Same author

Valve microstructure and phylomineralogy of New Zealand chitons.

Journal of structural biology·2016

Same author

Genomic imprinting: theories and data.

Heredity·2014

Same author

Non-conflict theories for the evolution of genomic imprinting.

Heredity·2014

Same author

Evolutionary consequences of microhabitat: population-genetic structuring in kelp- vs. rock-associated chitons.

Molecular ecology·2011

Same author

Molecular systematics of the marine gastropod families Trochidae and Calliostomatidae (Mollusca: Superfamily Trochoidea).

Molecular phylogenetics and evolution·2009

Area of Science:

History of Science
Medical Ethics
Genetics

Background:

The eugenics movement gained traction in the early 20th century.
Early proponents of eugenics were intellectually capable but held different societal values.

Observation:

The historical trajectory of eugenics offers critical lessons.
Modern medical geneticists can learn from the rise and fall of this movement.

Findings:

Eugenics was driven by flawed social values rather than a lack of scientific intellect.
The movement's history demonstrates the dangers of applying social biases to genetic policy.

Implications:

Medical genetics must critically examine its ethical frameworks.
Understanding historical eugenics is crucial for responsible innovation in genetic technologies.
Societal values must guide, not be dictated by, genetic advancements.

Keywords:

Genetics and Reproduction Twentieth Century