A comparative study of open, laparoscopic intracorporeal, and laparoscopic assisted low anterior resection and...

This study was done to investigate whether laparoscopic intracorporeal (LI) or laparoscopic assisted (LA) colon resection results in improved anastomotic healing compared with open colon resection (OR). Thirty-six domestic swine were randomly assigned to undergo either LI, LA, or OR of the rectosigmoid. For OR cases, the sigmoid was resected through a midline incision, and a transanal end-to-end stapled anastomosis was constructed with an ILS device. For LA and LI cases, the sigmoid was laparoscopically mobilized and divided distally, using 5 trocar sites. For LA cases, the proximal sigmoid was brought out through an enlarged trocar site and resected; the ILS anvil was secured to the proximal end, and the colon was replaced in the abdominal cavity where the anastomosis was completed by transanal insertion and firing of ILS device. For LI cases, the sigmoid was resected laparoscopically and retrieved through a 33 mm trocar. The ILS anvil was introduced via the same trocar, and the device was laparoscopically secured with two Endoloop (Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Cincinnati, OH) pursestring sutures. The anastomosis was completed the same way as for LA cases. Animals were killed at 7 days, at which time the anastomoses were evaluated by barium enema, bursting pressure, and histologic appearance. There were no radiographic anastomotic leaks. The mean bursting pressure was 205 +/- 65 mmHg for the 13 OR animals, 240 +/- 53 mmHg for 11 LA animals, and 242 +/- 43 mmHg for the 12 LI animals (N.S.). Histologic evaluation for inflammation indicated no significant differences.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)