Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 14, 2026

Diagnosis of Musculus Gastrocnemius Tightness - Key Factors for the Clinical Examination
Published on: July 7, 2016
Reliability of standard foot radiographic measurements
C L Saltzman1, E A Brandser, K S Berbaum
1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Iowa, Iowa City 52242.
Abstract:
Fifty standing dorsoplantar and lateral foot radiographs were obtained on a consecutive series of patients seen in an orthopaedic foot and ankle clinic. These radiographs were duplicated, and eight common foot measurements were made on each pair by six experienced examiners. Measurements were made in two ways: first by a subjective visual assessment, and second by quantitative evaluation made according to strictly defined criteria. All measurements were made under controlled, ideal conditions with similar high quality goniometers. The results demonstrated overall greater reliability in the quantitative methods than the non-quantitative methods. For each of the quantitative techniques, a cumulated frequency distribution of differences between examiners was calculated. The approximate 95% bounds for these measures were: hallux-metatarsophalangeal angle = 6 degrees, first intermetatarsal angle = 4 degrees, metatarsophalangeal-5 angle = 11 degrees, fourth intermetatarsal angle = 4 degrees, AP talocalcaneal angle = 20 degrees, lateral talocalcaneal angle = 12 degrees, sesamoid station = 2 grades, and forefoot width = 5 mm. Physicians using these parameters to make decisions regarding patient care and clinical outcomes need to keep in mind these potential errors in making foot radiographic measurements.
More Related Videos
09:18Doppler Ultrasound-Based Leg Blood Flow Assessment During Single-Leg Knee-Extensor Exercise in an Uncontrolled Setting
Published on: December 15, 2023
05:49Reliability of Artificial Intelligence-Based Cone Beam Computed Tomography Integration with Digital Dental Images
Published on: February 23, 2024