Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Research in general practice: international problems--international solutions

J G Howie1

  • 1Department of General Practice, University of Edinburgh, UK.

Family Practice
|December 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary

Primary care research needs better integration with practice and policy. Addressing conflicts between research agendas and improving infrastructure are key to enhancing research impact.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Developing a 'consultation quality index' (CQI) for use in general practice.

Family practice·2000
Same author

Quality at general practice consultations: cross sectional survey.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·1999
Same author

A comparison of three methods of setting prescribing budgets, using data derived from defined daily dose analyses of historic patterns of use.

The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners·1999
Same author

Reducing consultations for symptoms of cystitis using a health education leaflet.

The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners·1998
Same author

A comparison of a Patient Enablement Instrument (PEI) against two established satisfaction scales as an outcome measure of primary care consultations.

Family practice·1998
Same author

Measuring quality in general practice. Pilot study of a needs, process and outcome measure.

Occasional paper (Royal College of General Practitioners)·1997

Area of Science:

  • Primary Care Research
  • Health Services Research
  • Health Policy

Background:

  • Primary care research has increased visibility but often lacks impact on practice and government planning.
  • Discrepancies exist between the research agendas of various stakeholders, including government, professional bodies, and academic institutions.
  • The translation of research findings into tangible improvements in healthcare delivery remains a challenge.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the differing research agendas of various health system stakeholders.
  • To develop and illustrate a research project focused on defining and measuring the quality of care for patients with arthritic pain.
  • To analyze conflicts between research agendas, methodologies, and stakeholder expectations to explain the gap between research, practice, and policy.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of diverse research agendas (government, professional, academic).
  • Development of a case study research project on quality of care for arthritic pain.
  • Exploration of conflicts using the case study as an illustration.

Main Results:

  • Identified conflicts between research agendas, research styles, and the needs of purchasers and providers.
  • Developed a model to explain the disconnect between research, practice, and policy-making.
  • Highlighted the importance of a supportive research climate, adequate infrastructure, and appropriate training.

Conclusions:

  • Research, practice, and policy-making often operate in silos, hindering effective integration.
  • A supportive research environment, robust infrastructure, and adequate training are crucial for maximizing research impact.
  • Understanding and reconciling differing stakeholder agendas is essential for improving the translation of primary care research into policy and practice.

Related Experiment Videos