Regional diaphragm shortening measured by sonomicrometry

Diaphragmatic shortening measured by sonomicrometry has been compared in the two major anatomic segments, costal and crural. Data obtained by videofluoroscopy found a variation in subsegmental shortening within segments (Sprung et al. J. Appl. Physiol. 67: 655-662, 1989). No reproducible pattern of subsegmental shortening has emerged, and the mechanisms leading to this subsegmental variation in shortening are unknown. Therefore, we compared subsegmental shortening in both segments of the diaphragm in seven supine pentobarbital-anesthetized dogs. Seven pairs of sonomicrometer transducers were implanted in the two segments, and subsegmental shortening during spontaneous breathing was measured. To determine potential mechanisms contributing to the variation in shortening, measurements were made during stimulated breathing, after epiphrenic stimulation, and during occluded breaths. We found electrical stimulation at physiological frequencies of 10 and 20 Hz reduced the variation in subsegmental shortening, whereas stimulated breathing did not. Occluded breaths showed a consistent decrease in the amount of shortening, particularly in the dome of the costal diaphragm, compared with shortening in the area of apposition. Comparison of shortening between segments revealed greater crural than costal shortening. We conclude that subsegmental variation in activation can contribute to variation in subsegmental shortening and that the afterload can effect shortening during occluded breaths.