Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Quantification of parasite aggregation: a simulation study

R D Gregory1, M E Woolhouse

  • 1Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, UK.

Acta Tropica
|August 1, 1993
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Revealing uncertainty in the status of biodiversity change.

Nature·2024
Same author

Detection of potentially novel paramyxovirus and coronavirus viral RNA in bats and rats in the Mekong Delta region of southern Viet Nam.

Zoonoses and public health·2017
Same author

Agriculture policy. EU agricultural reform fails on biodiversity.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2014
Same author

Ecology. Essential biodiversity variables.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2013
Same author

Survival rates of tropical and temperate passerines: a Trinidadian perspective.

The American naturalist·2008
Same author

Patterns in parasite epidemiology: the peak shift.

Parasitology today (Personal ed.)·2006
Same journal

Efficacy of insecticides applied on Indoor Residual Spraying against wild populations of Mansonia humeralis Dyar e Knab, 1916 (Diptera, Culicidae) in western Amazonia.

Acta tropica·2026
Same journal

Gut Bacterial Communities in Sand Fly Vectors from Türkiye.

Acta tropica·2026
Same journal

Further morphological features, molecular characterization, and Wolbachia endosymbionts of Dirofilaria ursi Yamaguti, 1941 (Spirurida: Onchocercidae) from the Japanese black bear Ursus thibetanus japonicus Schlegel (Carnivora: Ursidae).

Acta tropica·2026
Same journal

Spatial dispersal of Lutzomyia longipalpis in an urban area under deltamethrin collars intervention.

Acta tropica·2026
Same journal

Ras-related protein Rab18 from hydatid cyst of Echinococcus granulosus induces apoptosis and autophagy in AML12 cells by inhibiting the PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway.

Acta tropica·2026
Same journal

Ecological divergence of Paracoccidioides brasiliensis lineages and P. lutzii with SDG-relevant implications.

Acta tropica·2026
See all related articles

Smaller sample sizes in parasite infection studies lead to underestimation of key parameters like mean burden and aggregation. Geometric mean and prevalence remain unaffected, highlighting the critical impact of sample size on statistical behavior.

Area of Science:

  • Parasitology
  • Statistical Modeling
  • Ecological Dynamics

Background:

  • Estimating parasite infection parameters is crucial for understanding host-pathogen dynamics.
  • Sample size, parasite aggregation, and mean burden are key factors influencing these estimates.
  • Field studies often face challenges with varying sample sizes, particularly in relation to host age.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the statistical behavior of parasite infection estimators.
  • To determine the influence of sample size, parasite aggregation, and mean burden on parameter estimation.
  • To assess the implications for interpreting field-based ecological data.

Main Methods:

  • A simulation study was employed to analyze estimator behavior.
  • Variations in sample size, degree of parasite aggregation, and mean parasite burden were simulated.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Statistical associations between these factors and parameter estimates were examined.

    • Main Results:

    • Decreasing sample size systematically underestimates sample mean parasite burden, its variance, and parasite aggregation levels.
    • Geometric mean of parasite burden and infection prevalence appear independent of sample size effects.
    • Parameter estimates may depend on frequency distribution but are insensitive to population mean burden.

    Conclusions:

    • Sample size is a critical determinant of the accuracy of parasite infection parameter estimates.
    • Underestimation of key parameters due to small sample sizes can create artefactual patterns in ecological data.
    • Careful consideration of sample size is essential when interpreting field data, especially concerning host age-related patterns.