Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A bivariate approach to meta-analysis

H C Van Houwelingen1, K H Zwinderman, T Stijnen

  • 1Department of Medical Statistics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Leiden, The Netherlands.

Statistics in Medicine
|December 30, 1993
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Safety of Anti-TNF Treatment in Liver Transplant Recipients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Journal of Crohn's & colitis·2017
Same author

Suicidal ideation and subsequent completed suicide in both psychiatric and non-psychiatric populations: a meta-analysis.

Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences·2016
Same author

Meta-Regression of a Dose-Response Relationship of Methotrexate in Mono- and Combination Therapy in Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drug-Naive Early Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients.

Arthritis care & research·2016
Same author

Age affects joint space narrowing in patients with early active rheumatoid arthritis.

RMD open·2016
Same author

Metabolic health profile in young adults with Prader-Willi syndrome: results of a 2-year randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover GH trial.

Clinical endocrinology·2016
Same author

Tumour-free margins in vulvar squamous cell carcinoma: Does distance really matter?

European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990)·2016

This study introduces a new likelihood-based method for random effects meta-analysis, improving parameter estimation without normal approximations. It extends to bivariate models, enabling analysis of relationships between treatment effects and baseline improvements.

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Trials
  • Epidemiology

Background:

  • Traditional meta-analysis focuses on pairwise treatment differences using log(odds ratio) and Mantel-Haenszel methods.
  • Inference in meta-analysis typically assumes homogeneity or uses random effects models accounting for trial heterogeneity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present a likelihood-based method for estimating parameters in random effects models, avoiding normal distribution approximations.
  • To extend this method to a bivariate random effects model for analyzing relationships between improvement and baseline effects.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a likelihood-based approach for parameter estimation in random effects meta-analysis.
  • Extended the method to a bivariate random effects model to assess correlations between effects.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • The proposed likelihood method provides accurate parameter estimation in random effects models.
  • The bivariate model successfully infers the relationship between improvement and baseline effects using real-world data.

Conclusions:

  • The novel likelihood-based method enhances meta-analysis by offering precise parameter estimation and enabling bivariate analysis.
  • This approach advances the statistical methodology for synthesizing evidence from multiple clinical trials.