Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 20, 2026

Isolation of Human Atrial Myocytes for Simultaneous Measurements of Ca2+ Transients and Membrane Currents
Published on: July 3, 2013
Insights
Calcium antagonists show initial benefits for heart failure but long-term use of older types is disappointing. Newer agents may benefit selected patients, but more research is needed.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Calcium antagonists (CAs) demonstrate acute efficacy in heart failure (HF) patients.
- Older CAs like nifedipine, diltiazem, and verapamil yield disappointing long-term HF outcomes.
- Negative inotropic effects and neurohumoral activation contribute to adverse cardiovascular performance.
Discussion:
- Second-generation CAs offer selective vasodilation and reduced negative inotropic effects.
- These properties suggest potential utility in specific HF patient populations.
- Lack of large-scale, long-term trials hinders definitive evaluation of morbidity and mortality benefits.
Key Insights:
- Routine use of older CAs in heart failure is not recommended.
- Second-generation CAs may be beneficial for selected heart failure patients.
- Evidence for CA efficacy in isolated diastolic dysfunction is limited.
Outlook:
- Further research is warranted to assess long-term outcomes with newer CAs in heart failure.
- Calcium antagonists could be considered for elderly patients with symptomatic diastolic dysfunction.
- Coronary vasodilator effects of CAs may benefit patients with ischemic heart disease and heart failure symptoms.
Abstract:
One can summarize the current status of calcium antagonists to treat heart failure as follows: Usually there is a favorable acute response to these drugs in heart failure patients but long-term effects in the patients treated with nifedipine, diltiazem, and verapamil have produced rather disappointing results. Thus, they should not be used routinely in heart failure patients. Their main problems were related to the negative inotropic effects of the drugs, the lack of reduction in ventricular filling pressure, and activation of the neurohumoral systems which have an adverse effect on cardiovascular performance, for example, renin-angiotensin. In contrast, the second-generation calcium antagonists have more selective vasodilating properties and fewer negative inotropic properties, which, I believe, justifies their use in selected heart failure patients. Unfortunately, there are no large randomized controlled long-term trials to evaluate morbidity and mortality in heart failure patients treated with these agents. One can rationalize that the symptomatic elderly patient with isolated diastolic dysfunction can be treated effectively with calcium antagonists but, once again, there are no major trials evaluating any drug in the management of patients with isolated diastolic function not due to hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Rationale for using calcium antagonists could be best supported in patients with active ischemic heart disease and symptoms of heart failure. In this instance the coronary vasodilator effects may relieve myocardial ischemia and, by that mechanism, improve myocardial systolic and diastolic function.
Related Concept Videos
Antihypertensive Drugs: Action of Calcium Channel Blockers
Heart Failure Drugs: Inotropic Agents
Heart Failure Drugs: Diuretics
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System
Heart Failure Drugs: β-Blockers
Antianginal Drugs: Calcium Channel Blockers and Ranolazine
CCBs, a diverse class that includes dihydropyridines (nifedipine) and diphenylalkylamines (verapamil and diltiazem), exert their effect by blocking calcium channels in cardiac and smooth muscle cells. This...

