Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Indoor radon: a case study in risk communication

S D Page1

  • 1Radon Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC 20460.

American Journal of Preventive Medicine
|May 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary

Effective risk communication encourages public action on voluntary health risks like indoor radon (Environmental Protection Agency). Balancing persuasive messages with technical details is key for public health initiatives.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Harmonizing controls for chemicals and radionuclides.

Health physics·2001
Same author

Transmitting varicella to a gravida.

The Journal of reproductive medicine·2000
Same author

A model career ladder approach to medical technology education.

The American journal of medical technology·1980
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Environmental Health
  • Risk Communication
  • Public Health Policy

Background:

  • The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) program aims to reduce indoor radon risks.
  • Understanding public perception of risk is crucial for health interventions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore effective risk communication strategies for public health programs.
  • To examine how public concern influences environmental health priorities.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of the EPA's Radon Program.
  • Review of risk communication research.
  • Examination of public versus scientific priorities in environmental health.

Main Results:

  • Persuasive, simple messages with clear guidance are effective for voluntary risks (e.g., radon).
  • Public focus on involuntary risks shapes environmental health agendas and resource allocation.
  • A balance between persuasive and technical communication is needed.

Conclusions:

  • Improved communication can empower individuals to manage voluntary risks.
  • A more informed dialogue is necessary for setting national environmental health priorities.
  • Lessons from the EPA's Radon Program can inform other public health initiatives.

Related Experiment Videos