Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Computer-based vs manual health maintenance tracking. A controlled trial

P S Frame1, J G Zimmer, P L Werth

  • 1Tri-County Family Medicine, Dansville, NY.

Archives of Family Medicine
|July 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary

Computer-based health maintenance tracking significantly improves provider compliance compared to manual systems. This enhanced tracking can be integrated into routine patient care without increasing visits or costs.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Factors related to genetic testing in adults at risk for Huntington disease: the prospective Huntington at-risk observational study (PHAROS).

Clinical genetics·2016
Same author

The functional relationship of the longitudinal and circular muscle of the guinea-pig uterus and human fallopian tube.

Irish journal of medical science·2016
Same author

FUNCTIONAL LIMITATIONS AND ADIPOKINES IN HIV-INFECTED OLDER ADULTS.

The Journal of frailty & aging·2015
Same author

Process evaluation results from the HEALTHY nutrition intervention to modify the total school food environment.

Health education research·2013
Same author

Associations between gout, psoriasis, and sarcoidosis with consideration of their pathogenic significance.

Annals of internal medicine·2013
Same author

Survival benefit of primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy after myocardial infarction: does time to implant matter? A meta-analysis using patient-level data from 4 clinical trials.

Heart rhythm·2013

Area of Science:

  • Health Services Research
  • Primary Care Medicine
  • Health Informatics

Background:

  • Effective health maintenance tracking is crucial for preventive care in primary practice.
  • Manual tracking systems often have limitations in ensuring consistent provider adherence and patient engagement.
  • The integration of technology in healthcare management offers potential improvements in efficiency and compliance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the efficacy of computer-based versus manual health maintenance tracking systems.
  • To assess provider compliance with health maintenance protocols under different tracking systems.
  • To evaluate the cost-effectiveness and patient response to computer-assisted health reminders.

Main Methods:

  • A two-year prospective, randomized, controlled trial was conducted in a rural, multi-office family practice.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Participants included adult members of families with recent practice utilization.
  • Intervention involved a computer-based system generating automated reminders versus a manual flowchart system triggered by provider request.

    • Main Results:

    • Provider compliance with health maintenance protocols increased by 15 percentage points with computer-based tracking versus 4 percentage points with manual tracking.
    • The computer-based system demonstrated significantly higher compliance for eight out of eleven procedures.
    • Operating the computer-based system cost $0.78 per patient annually, without increasing patient visits or billings.

    Conclusions:

    • Computer-based health maintenance tracking systems are superior to manual systems in improving provider compliance.
    • Health maintenance can be effectively integrated into existing patient care without escalating healthcare utilization or costs.
    • Further research is needed to confirm these findings across diverse healthcare settings.