Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Cancers beget mutations versus mutations beget cancers

R T Prehn1

  • 1Department of Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle 98195.

Cancer Research
|October 15, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The epigenetic instruction manual for the operation of the genome.

Medical hypotheses·2002
Same author

On the prevention and therapy of prostate cancer by androgen administration.

Cancer research·1999
Same author

Regeneration versus neoplastic growth.

Carcinogenesis·1997
Same author

Infection may have shaped the evolution of the biphasic immune response to cancer.

Folia biologica·1997
Same author

The paradoxical association of regression with a poor prognosis in melanoma contrasted with a good prognosis in keratoacanthoma.

Cancer research·1996
Same author

Immunostimulation of cancer versus immunosurveillance.

Medicina·1996

Cancer may not primarily stem from genetic mutations. Instead, aberrant gene expression due to epigenetic factors could cause cancer, with mutations being a consequence, not a cause.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Epigenetics
  • Genomics

Background:

  • The traditional view posits cancer arises from genetic mutations in oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes.
  • This perspective is challenged by evidence suggesting alternative mechanisms.
  • The role of epigenetic alterations in cancer development warrants further investigation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose and examine the alternative hypothesis that cancer phenotypes result from aberrant gene expression patterns.
  • To explore the role of epigenetic mechanisms, rather than mutations, in driving cancer development.
  • To re-evaluate the causal relationship between mutations and cancer.

Main Methods:

  • Review and synthesis of existing evidence supporting epigenetic dysregulation in cancer.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Theoretical examination of how epigenetic changes could lead to cancer phenotypes.
  • Analysis of the potential role of replicative errors in the cancer genome.

    • Main Results:

    • The study proposes that epigenetic dysregulation, not mutations, is the primary driver of cancer.
    • Mutations observed in cancer may arise as a consequence of epigenetic changes and slow repair mechanisms.
    • These mutations, occurring at inactivated genomic sites, may have limited biological significance.

    Conclusions:

    • The hypothesis that cancer is primarily caused by mutations may be incorrect.
    • Aberrant gene expression patterns, driven by epigenetic mechanisms, are a more likely cause of cancer.
    • Cancers may actually 'beget' mutations, rather than the other way around.