Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Frequency modulation versus amplitude modulation discrimination: evidence for a second frequency modulation encoding

B W Edwards1, N F Viemeister

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis 55455.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
|August 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Intensity discrimination and detection of amplitude modulation in electric hearing.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2000
Same author

Observer weighting of monaural level information in a pair of tone pulses.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2000
Same author

Lexical boundary error analysis in hypokinetic and ataxic dysarthria.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2000
Same author

Stochastic properties of cat auditory nerve responses to electric and acoustic stimuli and application to intensity discrimination.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2000
Same author

Intensity discrimination and detection of amplitude modulation.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·1999
Same author

Female predominance in spasmodic dysphonia.

Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry·1998
Same journal

High-resolution depth estimation for multiple wideband sources in deep sea via sparse Bayesian learninga).

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

Depression markers in speech: An approach based on tract variables dynamics.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

The oyster toadfish (Opsanus tau) alters active and diurnal calling amid vessel noise in New York City.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

Experimental noise characterisation of phase-locked tandem-rotor in edgewise flight.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

The tune-text-temporal synergy: Prosodic effects of final segmental weakening in Neapolitan.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

Monitoring vessel movement above critical offshore infrastructure using distributed acoustic sensing.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
See all related articles

Amplitude modulation (AM) and frequency modulation (FM) are processed by overlapping neural mechanisms. Discrimination thresholds suggest shared encoding, with a second independent mechanism for FM at higher modulation indices.

Area of Science:

  • Auditory perception
  • Psychoacoustics
  • Signal processing

Background:

  • Understanding how the auditory system encodes amplitude modulation (AM) and frequency modulation (FM) is crucial for explaining auditory perception.
  • Previous research suggests distinct and overlapping neural pathways for processing AM and FM signals.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the encoding mechanisms of amplitude modulation (AM) and frequency modulation (FM) in auditory perception.
  • To determine the extent to which AM and FM are processed by shared or independent neural mechanisms.

Main Methods:

  • AM-FM discrimination tasks were employed using adaptive procedures and a 3-alternative forced-choice (3IFC) paradigm.
  • Psychometric functions were measured under fixed-level conditions with varying modulation indices (beta) for FM.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • AM-FM discrimination thresholds were significantly higher than individual AM or FM detection thresholds, indicating shared encoding.
  • Nonmonotonic psychometric functions were observed, suggesting FM is encoded by both a shared AM mechanism and a second, independent mechanism.

Conclusions:

  • The auditory system likely employs partially overlapping mechanisms for encoding AM and FM.
  • A second, independent FM encoding mechanism, possibly related to instantaneous frequency changes, becomes more detectable with increasing FM modulation index.