Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Value judgment in the Oregon Medicaid experiment

R M Kaplan1

  • 1Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla 92093-0622.

Medical Care
|October 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary

Oregon

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A novel neurotropic microsporidium from the swamp guppy Micropoecilia picta from Grenada, West Indies.

Diseases of aquatic organisms·2024
Same author

Physician deaths from COVID-19 have been lower than expected.

Occupational medicine (Oxford, England)·2021
Same author

Importation of macrocyclic lactone resistant cyathostomins on a US thoroughbred farm.

International journal for parasitology. Drugs and drug resistance·2020
Same author

Equine parasite control and the role of national legislation - A multinational questionnaire survey.

Veterinary parasitology·2018
Same author

The appropriate antiparasitic treatment: Coping with emerging threats from old adversaries.

Equine veterinary journal·2016
Same author

Antiparasitic efficacy of a novel plant-based functional food using an Ascaris suum model in pigs.

Acta tropica·2014

Area of Science:

  • Health Services Research
  • Public Health Policy
  • Medical Ethics

Background:

  • Oregon's Medicaid prioritization experiment aimed to expand healthcare access.
  • The initial proposal involved four judgment levels: community values, health state desirability, treatment efficacy, and commissioner reordering.
  • The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services initially rejected the plan due to subjective health state ratings.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the reliability and validity of the four judgment levels used in Oregon's prioritization experiment.
  • To assess the evidence supporting the use of community values, health state desirability, medical judgment, and commissioner reordering in healthcare prioritization.
  • To inform future healthcare prioritization initiatives.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of the evidence for reliability and validity of four distinct judgment methods.
  • Comparison of subjective data (health state desirability) against other prioritization components.
  • Review of the Oregon Health Services Commission's decision-making process.

Main Results:

  • Health state desirability ratings demonstrated the strongest evidence of reliability and validity among the four judgment levels.
  • Despite initial rejection, the subjective component was found to be the most robust.
  • The revised Oregon plan, omitting health state ratings, was approved.

Conclusions:

  • The findings challenge the exclusion of subjective health state desirability data in healthcare prioritization.
  • Evidence supports the inclusion of well-validated subjective measures in policy decisions.
  • Future prioritization experiments should consider robust methods for incorporating patient values and health state valuations.
Keywords:
Americans with Disabilities Act 1990Health Care and Public HealthMedicaid

Related Experiment Videos