Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[What remains of arthrography?]

G Morvan1

  • 1Cabinet d'imagerie de l'appareil locomoteur, Paris.

La Revue Du Praticien
|June 15, 1994
PubMed
Summary

Arthrography, especially with CT scans (arthro-CT), remains a gold-standard diagnostic tool for various joint conditions. Despite advancements in MRI, arthrography offers excellent spatial resolution, cost-effectiveness, and safety for specific clinical indications.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Ultrasound of wrist and hand masses.

Diagnostic and interventional imaging·2015
Same author

US appearance of partial-thickness supraspinatus tendon tears: Application of the string theory. Pictorial essay.

Journal of ultrasound·2013
Same author

Stenosing tenosynovitis.

Journal of ultrasound·2013
Same author

Interventional musculoskeletal ultrasonography of the lower limb.

Diagnostic and interventional imaging·2012
Same author

Musculoskeletal interventional ultrasonography: the upper limb.

Diagnostic and interventional imaging·2012
Same author

Ultrasound-guided injection in osteoarticular pathologies: general principles and precautions.

Diagnostic and interventional imaging·2012

Area of Science:

  • Radiology
  • Medical Imaging
  • Orthopedic Diagnostics

Background:

  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is increasingly used for joint imaging.
  • Arthrography, a traditional imaging technique, is still relevant in modern diagnostics.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the continued relevance and applications of arthrography in joint imaging.
  • To compare the advantages and disadvantages of arthrography versus MRI for specific pathologies.

Main Methods:

  • Review of arthrography's role in diagnosing intra-articular foreign bodies, labral tears, chondral/ligamentous lesions, and rotator cuff tears.
  • Comparison of imaging quality, ease of use, cost, and risk associated with arthrography and MRI.

Main Results:

  • Arthrography (with or without CT) provides excellent spatial resolution for evaluating intra-articular pathologies.
  • It is cost-effective, safe, and well-suited for assessing foreign bodies, labral tears, and specific ligamentous injuries.
  • MRI is preferred for knee meniscus/ligaments and shoulder rotator cuff but arthrography remains competitive.

Conclusions:

  • Arthrography and CT-arthrography are valuable diagnostic tools with a favorable risk-benefit ratio for many joint conditions.
  • While MRI is advancing, arthrography will likely remain a crucial imaging modality for the foreseeable future.

Related Experiment Videos