Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Low vision reading with sequential word presentation

G S Rubin1, K Turano

  • 1Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205.

Vision Research
|July 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Lateral gain is impaired in macular degeneration and can be targeted to restore vision in mice.

Nature communications·2022
Same author

Electronic books as low vision aids.

The British journal of ophthalmology·2010
Same author

The effect of retinal image slip on peripheral visual acuity.

Journal of vision·2009
Same author

Visual and medical risk factors for motor vehicle collision involvement among older drivers.

The British journal of ophthalmology·2008
Same author

Visual function and quality of life following vitrectomy and epiretinal membrane peel surgery.

The British journal of ophthalmology·2006
Same author

An unusual strategy for fixation in a patient with bilateral advanced age related macular disease.

The British journal of ophthalmology·2004
Same journal

Computational and mathematical models in vision: Quantitative approaches to understanding visual perception.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Complex interactions between lightness, chroma, and hue in color ensemble perception.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Driving with autism spectrum disorder: Exploring the impact of tactile hazard warnings on gaze behavior and hazard responses.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Early visual processing in adults with ADHD: evidence from contrast sensitivity, spatial integration, and external noise.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Pupil reflexes generate the peripheral drift illusion due to ON/OFF motion responses.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Perceived direction of glass patterns can flip by 90°: A neural model.

Vision research·2026
See all related articles

Individuals with central field loss (CFL) read slower due to inefficient eye movements and limited peripheral pattern decoding. Even with reduced saccades, CFL subjects had longer word durations, indicating other factors contribute to reading speed reduction.

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Visual Neuroscience
  • Human Factors

Background:

  • Individuals with central scotomas (central field loss, CFL) exhibit significantly slower reading speeds compared to those without this condition.
  • The underlying reasons for this reading deficit are not fully understood, but inefficient eye movements are a suspected factor.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine the extent to which inefficient eye movements contribute to the slower reading speeds observed in individuals with central field loss (CFL).
  • To compare reading performance using rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) versus conventional page presentation (PAGE) in individuals with and without CFL.

Main Methods:

  • A rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) technique was employed, presenting text sequentially in a single visual field location.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Reading rates and word durations were measured for RSVP and PAGE presentation in 14 subjects with CFL and 9 subjects without CFL (noCFL).
  • Eye movements (saccades) were recorded using a scanning laser ophthalmoscope in four CFL subjects during both RSVP and PAGE reading.

    • Main Results:

    • Reading rates improved with RSVP compared to PAGE for all subjects, but the improvement was less pronounced in CFL subjects (1.5x) than noCFL subjects (2.1x).
    • CFL subjects showed a greater reduction in word duration with RSVP but still required longer durations than noCFL subjects.
    • While RSVP reduced saccades per word in CFL subjects, they still made more saccades than noCFL subjects, indicating inefficient eye movements contribute partially to the deficit.

    Conclusions:

    • Inefficient eye movements account for only a portion of the reading speed reduction in individuals with central field loss (CFL).
    • The limited capacity of the peripheral retina to perform pattern decoding is a significant, potentially more important, factor contributing to slower reading speeds in CFL patients.