Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Low-cost, office-based, screening colonoscopy

J D Rogge1, M F Elmore, S J Mahoney

  • 1Indianapolis Gastroenterology Research Foundation, Beech Grove, Indiana.

The American Journal of Gastroenterology
|October 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Inhibitors of nutrient pathways: nature's overlooked antibiotic arsenal.

Natural product reports·2026
Same author

A Streptomyces megacluster encodes synergistic biotin-targeting antibiotics.

Nature·2026
Same author

Evaluating Calmodulin-Protein Interactions by Rapid Photoactivated Cross-Linking in Live Cells Metabolically Labeled with Photo-Methionine.

Journal of proteome research·2019
Same author

Comparison of a 2D iPad application and 3D body scanner to air displacement plethysmography for measurement of body fat percentage.

Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association·2019
Same author

The effects of bolt length on penetration hole characteristics, brain damage and specified-risk material dispersal in finished cattle stunned with a penetrating captive bolt stunner.

Meat science·2019
Same author

Membrane activity profiling of small molecule <i>B. subtilis</i> growth inhibitors utilizing novel duel-dye fluorescence assay.

MedChemComm·2018
Same journal

Calendar of Courses, Symposiums and Conferences.

The American journal of gastroenterology·2026
Same journal

Molecular Nonendoscopic Tests for the Early Detection of Esophageal Squamous Carcinoma and High-Grade Dysplasia: Promising Progress.

The American journal of gastroenterology·2026
Same journal

ACG Clinical Guideline: Colonic Diverticulitis.

The American journal of gastroenterology·2026
Same journal

Continuing Medical Education Questions: July 2026.

The American journal of gastroenterology·2026
Same journal

Continuing Medical Education Questions: July 2026.

The American journal of gastroenterology·2026
Same journal

2026 CME Information.

The American journal of gastroenterology·2026
See all related articles

Regular screening colonoscopies can detect and remove early-stage colorectal cancer polyps safely and affordably. This study indicates that colonoscopy is a cost-effective method for reducing cancer incidence and mortality.

Area of Science:

  • Gastroenterology
  • Oncology
  • Preventive Medicine

Background:

  • Colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and mortality can be reduced through early detection and removal of precancerous lesions.
  • Screening programs must be cost-effective, safe, and time-efficient to be widely adopted.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the safety, cost-effectiveness, and time efficiency of screening colonoscopy in an office setting.
  • To assess the yield of adenomatous and hyperplastic polyps, including adenocarcinomas, during screening colonoscopies.

Main Methods:

  • A total of 639 patients underwent screening colonoscopy in an office facility.
  • Physician time for normal examinations was minimized, including sedation, the procedure, and reporting.
  • The total charge for a normal screening colonoscopy was established at $150.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Polyps (adenomatous and/or hyperplastic) were detected in 34.1% of patients, with 160 adenomatous and 134 hyperplastic polyps removed.
  • Six adenocarcinomas were identified in five patients.
  • Complications were minimal, including one case of delayed bleeding and one of post-polypectomy syndrome, both requiring no intervention. Average physician time was 18 minutes for normal exams.

Conclusions:

  • Screening colonoscopy is a safe and efficient procedure that can be performed in an office setting.
  • Limiting physician time contributes to a low cost, making it competitive with other cancer screening methods.
  • Further long-term studies are warranted to confirm the impact of screening colonoscopy on CRC mortality reduction.