Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Distraction systems for ankle arthroscopy

S J Palladino1

  • 1California College of Podiatric Medicine, San Francisco.

Clinics in Podiatric Medicine and Surgery
|July 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Pressure-removing strategies in neuropathic ulcer therapy. An alternative to total contact casting.

Clinics in podiatric medicine and surgery·1994
Same author

Metatarsus adductus and selected radiographic measurements of the first ray in normal feet.

Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association·1992
Same author

Intra-evaluator variability in the measurement of proximal articular set angle.

The Journal of foot surgery·1992
Same author

Surgical approaches of the rearfoot and ankle.

Clinics in podiatric medicine and surgery·1991
Same author

Plantaris tendon reconstruction of the lateral ankle ligaments.

The Journal of foot surgery·1991
Same author

Cubonavicular coalition.

Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association·1991

For most ankle arthroscopy, manual distraction suffices. Invasive distraction is reserved for complex cases needing better visualization or specific posterior talar dome pathology, while noninvasive options suit routine procedures.

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic Surgery
  • Arthroscopy Techniques

Background:

  • Routine ankle arthroscopy often requires minimal or no joint distraction.
  • Complex cases may necessitate distraction for adequate visualization and instrument access.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the indications and techniques for ankle distraction in arthroscopic surgery.
  • To compare invasive and noninvasive distraction methods for ankle arthroscopy.

Main Methods:

  • Review of current literature and clinical experience with ankle distraction systems.
  • Discussion of specific pathologies and surgical scenarios benefiting from distraction.

Main Results:

  • Manual distraction is sufficient for most routine ankle arthroscopy, including talar dome fractures.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Invasive distraction is indicated for inadequate visualization, posterior talar dome/tibial surface pathology, or ankle fusion.
  • Noninvasive distraction systems offer viable joint separation for conditions like adhesive capsulitis and meniscoid lesions, facilitating early rehabilitation.

    • Conclusions:

    • The choice of ankle distraction method should be tailored to the specific case, balancing visualization needs with potential complications.
    • Noninvasive distraction is increasingly effective for routine procedures, with invasive options reserved for challenging cases.
    • Optimal visualization and instrument maneuverability are crucial for successful ankle arthroscopic surgery.