Related Experiment Videos
Comparison of spiral computed tomography versus conventional computed tomography multiplanar reconstructions of a
K W McEnery1, A J Wilson, W A Murphy
1Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University Medical School, St. Louis, Missouri 63110.
Purpose:
The capabilities of spiral computed tomography (CT) versus conventional CT to represent minimal fracture displacements on multiplanar reconstruction images in a phantom model were evaluated.
Materials And Methods:
A displacement phantom was created from Teflon and was scanned with conventional and spiral CT, at slice collimations of 2 mm, 3 mm, and 5 mm. Three Z-axis interpolation algorithms (360_LI, 180_LI and 180_HI) were employed to process the spiral image data into planar images. Displacements of 5 mm or less were represented in the phantom, and the resultant multiplanar reconstructions were analyzed for the precision of displacement representation. Specifically, the edge profiles of the reconstructed images were measured and compared.
Results:
Spiral CT reconstruction edge profiles were similar to those of conventional CT when minimal table increments (3 mm/sec or less), and an advanced interpolation algorithm (180_LI) was employed. Images obtained with 360_LI interpolation manifested the effect of widened slice profile even when employing minimal table speeds.
Conclusions:
With minimal table increment (3 mm/sec or less) and a high-order interpolation algorithm (180_LI), spiral-CT-derived reconstructions demonstrate similar edge profile resolution to reconstructions obtained from conventional CT.